Live data from Hacker News

East German Stasi Tactics – Zersetzung (2021)

maxhertzberg.co.uk

241–250 of 256 posts

Re: East German Stasi Tactics – Zersetzung (2021)

#241

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Sources for your allegations ? not an allegation. You should avoid big words if you dont know what they mean. > The statistics I saw, showed in contrary an increase in suicide rates. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11063965/ Surgery is not a common part of transitioning. Transitioning treatment, which is what I said, is usually a process where the most common plans include hormone replacement therapy, pube…

I read the study, the author is much less affirmative than you and spends a lot of time explaining that the data is really subpar: "A dearth of high-quality studies that evaluate outcomes in suicide following gender-affirming treatment poses severe limitations on the extent of claims made during the informed consent process for gender-affirming treatment. An abundance of claims that are not backed by evidence does no…

> Another way of saying that what doctor associations is groupthink rather than evidence-based medicine.

Way to read that in the worst way possible. Their biggest issue was how disparate the data was. I shared that one because it had the largest sample of papers, but there are plenty of other meta studies, and individual studies with the same conclusions

The website "What does scholarly research say about the effect of gender transition" by Cornell university did a review of 55 papers, found 0 that said it caused harm and 93% that said they improved life for trans people.

For an individual paper with good peer review and sample you can read Mental Health outcomes in Transgender and Non binary youth receving gender affirming care by Dana Tondoff, where they found that there was a 73% decrese in suicidicality and 60% decrease in depression.

Like its not group think when no one has done any research showing it does not work and plenty have shown it does

> Also, you use a classic motte-and-bailey tactic here, to limit treatments to hormonal ones, excluding surgical.

its not a tactic, it is literally the most common prescribed treatment for gender dysphoria. its like discussing cancer, teh most common treatments are surgery and chemotherapy. Some people get radiotherapy and they have much worse outcomes, because they were in a worse spot to begin with, not because radiotherapy does not work...

> Regarding young girls, we didn't have problems before.

but according to you all these spaces were created to safe them from perverts. So no problems, other than the rampant perverts?

> So I don't see why you're looking for a special "method" for this.

because you wanna enforce gender discrimination spaces based on genetials. So someone gotta check you got the right ones, or else a pervert could go in. So to "protect" your daughter you now have a way more invasive system than just letting people pee

> And whatever the status of trans people, a pervert could well say that he is one to enter in safe spaces for women

So the problem is not transpeople but perverts pretending to be trans people. So we should punish transpeople to protect girls from the perverts pretending to be trans people. Should we not just deal with the perverts and leave the transpeople alone?

> . We see this already well in sports, and with the obvious, and sometimes dangerous problems associated.

there have been 0 issues with transpeople in sports. The IOC has allowed trans women in the olympics since 2004, they have won 0 medals.

if transitioning was an overt advantage, if transwomen would 100% beat regular women then every medal would be won by a transowman. However its literally never happened.

The only cases of transpeople in sports that get discussed are Lia Thomas, a university swimmer (who won 1 race) and who is like 1 minute behind the best times of Katie Ledecky which is a cis swimmer. And thats about it.

The only scientific review of trans people in sports was done in the US army and they found no significant advantage in strength after 1 year in HRT and only 15% in cardio but the sports assoc always recommend 2 years on HRT and Athletes are 40-70% faster than regular women so transwomen would still be 30-50% slower than them. transitioning also makes you lose 60% of your muscle mass, the controlled test means they suually have lower levels than regular women and the "denser" muscles tend to get tired quicker due to worse oxygenation.

Transwomen in sports is a non issue, and the more it gets repeated the more it proves that the people who are against trans people simply have not thought about for longer than "oh a man shouldnt compete against women" and never again.

An average girl is 5'6, and average man is 5'9 so transwomen should dominate in basketball. Except the average WNBA player is 6'2.

Transwomen will never win in sports because athletes are the end of the tail distribution and transowomen are randomly sampled. A selected sample will always beat a random sample if the distributions are close.

if I have a dice with 5 numbers and I can throw it 100 times and pick the 3 highest, and you have a die that goes up to 6 but you only throw it once, I basically always gonna beat you.

Re: East German Stasi Tactics – Zersetzung (2021)

#242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The UK on a per capita GDP PPP basis is as poor, or poorer, than the poorest US state, Mississippi. [1] Immigration, trade policy, privatization, and financialization have cut the working class population off at the knees. It's an economically miserable country temporarily sustained only by the continued extraction of wealth in London, activity that continues only through inertia. This should be shocking given the st…

> The UK on a per capita GDP PPP basis is as poor, or poorer, than the poorest US state, Mississippi. Lets go through some basics, 40% of missippi's budget comes from federal money. California aint paying the tab of the UK, so yeah numbers look worse. the UK budget for a person includes healthcare, and rent is cheaper (except london). On average UK residents have more disposable income and higher quality of life (lon…

> the UK budget for a person includes healthcare,

I don't think you understand how GDP PPP works, but you understand this makes the UK look even worse, right? At any rate the point is the fact this comparison can even be made is grim: the UK as a whole's best argument for "we're better off than Mississippi" is "well, we uh, have the NHS." Yeah, basically every country has universal health care - it's not impressive...especially when wages and benefits are so poor in the UK that you have to import people to man it rather than drawing in the people you already have. Even the average Mississippian probably gets equivalent care through the byzantine US "universal" system (a quick Google shows 25% of the population is on Medicaid plus another 15% on Medicare, many hospital systems are owned by the government, etc.)

> and rent is cheaper (except london).

The average rent excluding London is 1341 pounds[1], or about $1800. The average rent in Mississippi is $1150. [2]

> No one in the UK would trade their life for the same money, way more driving, worse food, no healthcare and a opioid epidemic all over the place.

The article I linked was from someone who emigrated from the UK to Mississippi. I've also never, ever heard anyone compare UK good favorably to US Southern food. Or any food, really.

Perhaps most importantly, the government of Mississippi and the police don’t have hatred and resentment for the lower classes. Lower class ethnic British people are clearly reviled by their government and the upper classes, regardless of what party is in charge. Even excluding the racial angle, you yourself mention that with how the police spoke of and treated the girls in those scandals.

> the highest spending of the working class is housing which was cut by a conservative goverment to entrench purchasing power on the boomer generation. Cutting council house builds in the 70s was the biggest mistake in the recent history of the country

I don't care whether the "conservatives" or the "liberals" or the "greens" or anyone else did it (do you think I like Thatcher?), the fact is the UK has been horrifically mismanaged and went from one of the wealthiest countries in the world to one for whom the average person is more badly off than the average person in most advanced countries.

> it got ahead of wall street as a financial hub.

Being a financial hub is not great for anyone except the 1%, but nevertheless NYC is a larger financial hub than London, despite, once again, the enormous advantage London should have had. [3]

However, I would agree: if the US doesn't do something soon, it will end up like the UK: the elite and the rich do great, while financialization, free trade, and migration destroy the middle and lower classes. That's what we're already seeing. If we don't wake up, the dystopia seen in the UK is our future.

> yeah an there is a need for immigrants.

Yes, capitalists love cheap labor. We always have labor "shortages" that magically can only be solved by dumping supply on the labor market. The birthrate argument is particularly silly, since immigration depresses native births. [4] It's also a worldwide problem except in some developing countries, so the "we have to be nice" argument is ultimately hollowing out the countries the migrants come from.

> but it is also something that just happens. Outside of like north korea pretty much every country has people who come in and go out, for a myriad of reasons

Migrants come because the can get money. They can get money because of government policies that specifically enable them to get jobs and benefits. In other words, they are incentivized to come and policies are developed to support and assist them. Without these carrots, migration plummets. UK political leadership made a deliberate choice to pump the UK full of migrants, one that would have been opposed by the population had it been a referendum. Indeed in the UK case, it's been particularly obvious that voting for politicians that claim to oppose migration just gets you even more immigration.

[1] https://www.mirror.co.uk/money/average-asking-rent-outside-l... [2] https://www.redfin.com/state/Mississippi/rental-market [3] https://www.zyen.com/publications/public-reports/the-global-... [4] https://cis.org/Richwine/Impact-Immigration-US-Fertility

Re: East German Stasi Tactics – Zersetzung (2021)

#243
Everyone is a member of the secret service with different clearances. Also, everyone is an informant. Also, everyone is a mutant. Also, everyone is a member of a secret society. Being a mutant, informant, or a member of a secret society is a crime.

The computer is your friend! Everyone loves the computer. Just don't let it know that you are a mutant, an informant and a member of a secret society.

As I said before, exactly like the Paranoia GURPS plot.

Re: East German Stasi Tactics – Zersetzung (2021)

#244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Maurice Barrès wasn't a Nazi, and was a famous novelist of the XIXth century. He was part of the Académie Française, which is the most respected cultural body of the country. In this quote, he isn't against intellectualism, but against intellectuals thinking that they form a second society above the plebs, and who think better than them. Your ad hominem arguments are ignorant here, sorry. > You seem to lack media l…

> Maurice Barrès wasn't a Nazi being involved in the national socialist movement in france would make one a nazi. > In this quote, he isn't against intellectualism he was though, so are most fascists. Better to find an external threat, use populism and claim anyone who can see through the lies is a pompous university know-it-all, you know like every single fascist movement has ever done. > against intellectuals think…

[flagged]

Re: East German Stasi Tactics – Zersetzung (2021)

#245
post #234

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Was the misinformation even material? The perpetrator of the Southport stabbings was the child of recent African immigrants, so I don't see how the true facts of the case would have calmed any right-wing unrest.

The furore was whipped up on the basis of the perpetrator being Muslim, illegal, and an immigrant. In my opinion it fed off the residual unresolved tensions of grooming gang cases. But of course the actual perpetrator was none of these three things.

> on the basis of the perpetrator being Muslim, illegal, and an immigrant.

Let's not kid ourselves - it was on the basis of the perpetrator being non-white/non-ethnically-British. There's no shortage of the protesters being accused of racism, but now we're supposed to pretend it was about religion or following the law? That's called trying to have your cake and eat it to.

Re: East German Stasi Tactics – Zersetzung (2021)

#246
post #236
post #211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Far-right, unfortunately, is something of a trigger word suggesting Wikipedia is about to become unreliable in its coverage. As far as I can tell any suggestion that immigration levels should be low is likely to be a far-right position which means it is a very large tent. A tent that includes some undesirables and a lot of quite normal people. There is an odd situation where apparently countries can simultaneously ad…

Not so; Keir Starmer is talking about cracking down on immigration and is certainly not far-right. You veer into the far-right when you dehumanise immigrants and use terms like "cockroaches", "Muslim invasion", or "great replacement".

Keir Starmer is pushing [0] pretty standard far-right conspiracy theories about how the government was running an open-borders experiment, by design, in contravention of stated policies.

> ...and is certainly not far-right.

He's quacking like a duck. Talking about open borders is fair game for being identified as a dog whistler for people who believe in the great replacement theory - particularly when it is framed as duplicitous and intentional. I'd agree that it isn't, but once Wikipedia starts breaking out "far right" that is the sort of standard that can be applied.

[0] https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-speech-on-migratio... - although humorously it is apparently standard practice to redact parts of speeches as political in a political speech given by a politician.

Re: East German Stasi Tactics – Zersetzung (2021)

#247

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Maurice Barrès wasn't a Nazi being involved in the national socialist movement in france would make one a nazi. > In this quote, he isn't against intellectualism he was though, so are most fascists. Better to find an external threat, use populism and claim anyone who can see through the lies is a pompous university know-it-all, you know like every single fascist movement has ever done. > against intellectuals think…

[flagged]

[flagged]

Re: East German Stasi Tactics – Zersetzung (2021)

#248

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have you considered that perhaps they understood exactly that, and maybe better than you?

What clue makes you think that ?

What better tool is there to divide and control people than something basically inconsequential that someone is willing to get worked up over?

Re: East German Stasi Tactics – Zersetzung (2021)

#249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sharing the message because it brings me joy to have it shown to more people. I think it's a pretty reprehensible thing to say. I'm sure people say worse into their personal diary or even among friends and that is not criminalized. I might possibly even consider the defense of "oh nobody really reads my posts anyway and I deleted it quickly". But I absolutely will not stand for trying to claim that the post w…

I am not trying to say that it was not hateful - and proper moderation should be in place. Just like it has always been. I am merely trying to say that there should be proportion in the reaction. The society does not give you a death sentence to jay walk.

I'm not arguing with you. I'm arguing with the quotes around "hate".

Re: East German Stasi Tactics – Zersetzung (2021)

#250
post #234

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The furore was whipped up on the basis of the perpetrator being Muslim, illegal, and an immigrant. In my opinion it fed off the residual unresolved tensions of grooming gang cases. But of course the actual perpetrator was none of these three things.

> on the basis of the perpetrator being Muslim, illegal, and an immigrant. Let's not kid ourselves - it was on the basis of the perpetrator being non-white/non-ethnically-British. There's no shortage of the protesters being accused of racism, but now we're supposed to pretend it was about religion or following the law? That's called trying to have your cake and eat it to.

You reckon the riots would still happen if the story was that the perpetrator was - let's say - an aboriginal Australian or a pygmy from New Guinea? Highly doubtful. The narrative had to align with what the far right have been spinning up for the last decade or so.
Post reply on HN