Ultimately, whether one thinks that having more volume of and more or less fragmented statistics is good or bad depends on their opinion of the State. Olivier Ray wrote a great book about the history of statistics : Quand le monde s’est fait nombre (fr) https://archive.org/details/OlivierReynombre/ https://www.radiofrance.fr/franceculture/podcasts/les-chemin... . https://www.fnac.com/a9931250/Olivier-Rey-Quand-le-mon…
U.S. autism data project sparks uproar over ethics, privacy and intent
51–60 of 377 posts
Re: U.S. autism data project sparks uproar over ethics, privacy and intent
#52Aktion T4 next? This is a dark dark road. I suspect the US will become like Germany in the next few decades where the paranoia about handing any data over is justifiably high. I hope this burns the unethical side of the tech industry to the ground. It deserves it.
Re: U.S. autism data project sparks uproar over ethics, privacy and intent
#53[flagged]
What would you suggest Americans actually do? They voted this in knowing this would happen. It’s one thing to shout into a void about some vague disagreement, but it’s entirely different to actually take some form of real action. What should that action comprise?
Re: U.S. autism data project sparks uproar over ethics, privacy and intent
#54This is just another angle of placing people in camps. Combine this with the overzealous focus on transvestites and the so called "illegal aliens" you should see a pattern with where the Nazis began.
> transvestites The focus seems to lie on transgender people, not cross dressers.
Re: U.S. autism data project sparks uproar over ethics, privacy and intent
#55Re: U.S. autism data project sparks uproar over ethics, privacy and intent
#56But hey, considering what happened the last few months maybe Americans have a point for their case. In most of the Europe governments collapse and streets burn for much less all the time, in US they don't appear to have a recourse for at least 4 years.
Maybe its a good idea not to give the data to government affiliated billionaires that can crunch some numbers, feed the data to a machibne and come up with an optimization solutions like "If we can get rid of those suboptimal humans we can pay less income taxes". What are you going to do if the machine tells you that if an autist isn't making x amount of money by the age y it is drain to the society and the formula suggest that a deportation yields better outcomes financially?
Re: U.S. autism data project sparks uproar over ethics, privacy and intent
#57[flagged]
- "Kennedy said many autistic children were “fully functional” and “regressed … into autism when they were 2 years old. And these are kids who will never pay taxes, they’ll never hold a job, they’ll never play baseball, they’ll never write a poem, they’ll never go out on a date. Many of them will never use a toilet unassisted.”"
- "He also said, “Most cases now are severe. Twenty-five percent of the kids who are diagnosed with autism are nonverbal, non-toilet-trained, and have other stereotypical features.”"
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/fact-checking-robert-f...
Re: U.S. autism data project sparks uproar over ethics, privacy and intent
#58This is just another angle of placing people in camps. Combine this with the overzealous focus on transvestites and the so called "illegal aliens" you should see a pattern with where the Nazis began.
Nit, nobody actually cares all that much about trans vestites . Vest like from vestments meaning clothes. They're cross-dressers. Historically transsexual or transgender (depends on the country which one is the more prominent term) people have been called transvestites but it was a mischaracterization. Someone born with XX chromosomes but who lives his life full-time as a man is very different from a woman who likes…
Re: U.S. autism data project sparks uproar over ethics, privacy and intent
#59[flagged]
Re: U.S. autism data project sparks uproar over ethics, privacy and intent
#60[flagged]
What would you suggest Americans actually do? They voted this in knowing this would happen. It’s one thing to shout into a void about some vague disagreement, but it’s entirely different to actually take some form of real action. What should that action comprise?
2. Continue speaking loudly about the various criminal acts of this administration and continue reinforcing the importance of not tuning it out
3. Find promising candidates and fund their run in 2026 to flip the house and strangle the administration with impeachments over their long list of violations of the Constitution
4. Arm yourselves in general before the GOP finally decides they're okay with preventing certain people from buying firearms (specifically "mentally ill" people who don't like Trump, i.e. https://thehill.com/homenews/5200463-trump-derangement-syndr...)
There's a great deal on an AR-15 at Palmetto State Armory right now — only $400!: https://palmettostatearmory.com/psa-pa15-16-phos-a2-mid-leng...
A lot of libs don't know this, but shooting is also extremely fun and gun people are extremely friendly and welcoming. Get a gun, book a lesson at your local range, and enjoy an afternoon learning how to use it. Guns are also a lot of fun for the gear-junkie types that I'm sure are overrepresented here on HN.
EDIT: I changed the order of these, apologies to the commenter below!