Branch : Invite-Only Online Conversations. Email : Invite-Only Online Conversations.
Can someone help me bridge the gap?
31–40 of 45 posts
Branch : Invite-Only Online Conversations. Email : Invite-Only Online Conversations.
Can someone help me bridge the gap?
Let me see if I've got this right. Branch : Invite-Only Online Conversations. Email : Invite-Only Online Conversations. Can someone help me bridge the gap?
Email has notoriously not been updated for a while. I remember when Gmail putting threads as conversations being revolutionary.
This is pretty great: https://img.skitch.com/20120813-1iq1gk3ymwrguhy8qe3qi4192s.j...
All branches are public, you can link directly to them: http://branch.com/b/choosing-the-best-technology-for-my-webs...
Let me see if I've got this right. Branch : Invite-Only Online Conversations. Email : Invite-Only Online Conversations. Can someone help me bridge the gap?
Better interface for one. Email has notoriously not been updated for a while. I remember when Gmail putting threads as conversations being revolutionary.
Seems like Branch would become One More Thing To Check, as opposed to a replacement for e-mail. I don't think they're going for an replacement, either. I think I get their point, but I also can't see it as much more than Twitter repackaged with unique slang and a squeaky clean UI.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Better interface for one. Email has notoriously not been updated for a while. I remember when Gmail putting threads as conversations being revolutionary.
Threading in Gmail was definitely huge. They beat a lot of desktop mail clients to the punch, too, which always surprised me. Seems like Branch would become One More Thing To Check, as opposed to a replacement for e-mail. I don't think they're going for an replacement, either. I think I get their point, but I also can't see it as much more than Twitter repackaged with unique slang and a squeaky clean UI.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Threading in Gmail was definitely huge. They beat a lot of desktop mail clients to the punch, too, which always surprised me. Seems like Branch would become One More Thing To Check, as opposed to a replacement for e-mail. I don't think they're going for an replacement, either. I think I get their point, but I also can't see it as much more than Twitter repackaged with unique slang and a squeaky clean UI.
I like to think of branches as public email threads, but I get in trouble when I say that publicly. Obviously has poor connotations :)
Out of curiosity, where does it fit into your workflow specifically? Do you find yourself using either/any of Facebook, Twitter, Email, etc. less in particular?
How is this different from a forum post? It doesn't do anything for debates. http://branch.com/b/are-we-currently-in-a-tech-bubble
I think this looks interesting, as long as you don't apply the same "X of Y" comparisons. Someone likened it to a forum, and I think it's a nice take on it. Not necessarily something with SOCIAL all over it. The promo video was pretty horrible, though. I'm also getting a little tired of Valley videos that make it sound like we're curing cancer or something.
Cancer itself is not even "one thing" phenomologically speaking (IAMNA oncologist) it's a broad class of diseases, that may or may not have a single 'solution'.
Solution, in this context, being a state where the population does not need to worry about cancer as a statistically significant cause of death. It could equally likely linger in a status that is managed but not 'cured' in the traditional sense of the word, aka HIV.
I'm not sure how any of the highlighted features really promote intimacy or quality in conversation.
Let's ignore how they're pitching the service. I've participated in a Branch[1], and as a replacement for Twitter conversations, it is extraordinary. That's enough for me to keep the bookmarklet handy. [1] http://branch.com/b/for-years-news-developers-have-debated-t...