Earlier quoted context omitted.
Features are one thing - yes, nearly all IDEs have lots of the same features. But that looks like they copied XCode 4's appearance directly. It's a pity the screenshots are so low resolution - hopefully some higher resolution shots of the Samsung software will turn up. But even in this example it's easy to spot lifted design elements: * The centered tab selector buttons in the title bar of each pane * The overall sty…
A screenshot of Eclipse that I grabbed off Google Images: http://img.brothersoft.com/screenshots/softimage/e/eclipse_i... I don't use a lot of IDEs, but I honestly can't see any substantial distinctions between any of the three. (And no, I don't consider centering a pane a distinction.)
Samsung copied Xcode?
11–20 of 64 posts
Re: Samsung copied Xcode?
#12Seriously- this is an IDE for televisions.
Re: Samsung copied Xcode?
#13Re: Samsung copied Xcode?
#14Or maybe they cloned Visual Studio. Or Flash Builder. Or whatever. All of the IDEs with a design surface are largely the same. Seriously- this is an IDE for televisions.
Actually, I don't know why this court nonsense is still making the news.
Re: Samsung copied Xcode?
#15Re: Samsung copied Xcode?
#16If the claim is on the icon design along, the claim could stand stronger; but I guess it's not "catchy" enough to claim "Samsung copied XCode's icon design".
Why don't people make such claims on open-source projects? Is it because open-source project has no money for other people to sue off?
Re: Samsung copied Xcode?
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
Features are one thing - yes, nearly all IDEs have lots of the same features. But that looks like they copied XCode 4's appearance directly. It's a pity the screenshots are so low resolution - hopefully some higher resolution shots of the Samsung software will turn up. But even in this example it's easy to spot lifted design elements: * The centered tab selector buttons in the title bar of each pane * The overall sty…
A screenshot of Eclipse that I grabbed off Google Images: http://img.brothersoft.com/screenshots/softimage/e/eclipse_i... I don't use a lot of IDEs, but I honestly can't see any substantial distinctions between any of the three. (And no, I don't consider centering a pane a distinction.)
http://i.imgur.com/8uL8M.png vs http://cl.ly/IjBC
http://i.imgur.com/2Kn4j.png vs http://cl.ly/Iiob
http://i.imgur.com/RYYv9.png vs http://cl.ly/IiWX
We're not talking similar features here, we're talking lazy carbon-copied user interfaces. You honestly think this was accidental and there's only one way to make an IDE?
EDIT: A few more, now that we have a hi-res screenshot.
http://i.imgur.com/SYSv2.png vs http://cl.ly/IjUP
http://i.imgur.com/2nmUn.png vs http://i.imgur.com/4NFV6.png
http://i.imgur.com/HJ9s4.png vs http://i.imgur.com/qgpWc.png (that bar above "Scheme" is, you guessed it, a drop down)
Re: Samsung copied Xcode?
#18Or maybe they cloned Visual Studio. Or Flash Builder. Or whatever. All of the IDEs with a design surface are largely the same. Seriously- this is an IDE for televisions.
edit: cmelbye in this thread has a good comparison: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4378379
Re: Samsung copied Xcode?
#19Quick, find the patent for dockable panels and sue everyone!
Re: Samsung copied Xcode?
#20No, I'm pretty sure Samsung did not explicitly copy Xcode there. Although it's a pretty stupid move to create their own IDE in my opinion. I think the standard these days is to build on top of Eclipse.