Earlier quoted context omitted.
> While Ukraine unquestionably put up a hell of a fight, the fact that the numerically superior army with the better and more numerical equipment, backed by the multiple times bigger and richer country failed is a failure. Especially when you consider that Ukraine doesn't have a navy and barely had an air force and anti-air, yet Russia failed at establishing air or naval control, let alone dominance. That's certainly…
Why do you think any of these issues will not also be issues on a western front?
America's cyber defenses are being dismantled from the inside
161–170 of 218 posts
Re: America's cyber defenses are being dismantled from the inside
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Russia's chances against the Baltics are pretty good, I would say 1 in 3. And for Putin it's a proposition with no downside: at worst he loses another few hundred thousand subjects. Article 5 is still in effect, even if America won’t take its part. Attack of Baltics will trigger response from all neighbors including Finland, Sweden and Poland. Kaliningrad won’t last long, St.Petersburg will be within reach of artill…
If I were Putin I'd attack some very minor NATO state to check if NATO will really send soldiers to defend it. Example: is really somebody willing to die for Estonia? (Sorry HNers from Estonia, but you are just in the worst possible place of all of NATO.) If not, NATO will crumble into pieces. If yes, let's see who's sending soldiers and who won't, and how they will react to the first week of casualties. Keep going o…
Re: America's cyber defenses are being dismantled from the inside
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would think that phrase is related to the phrase, “he who does not work, does not eat”, which is in the Bible: https://biblehub.com/2_thessalonians/3-10.htm The phrase “he who does not work, does not eat” was never intended by its author to be applied to those who were physically incapable of working. You might say otherwise, but Saint Paul had been a very traditional adherent of the Jewish faith, which had require…
Paul's teaching is plainly at odds with Jesus' teachings, and people do a lot of acrobatics to try to reconcile the two. Jesus: 25 Therefore I say unto you, Be not anxious for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than the food, and the body than the raiment? 26 Behold the birds of the heaven, that they sow not, neither do they reap, no…
Today, after the Council of Niceae by Constantine 3 centuries after the events, nearly all Christian denominations follow Pauline doctrine. But where is his authority from? How is he any different from, say, Mohammad?
From all the Christian apologists I have talked to, they point to one verse and one verse only: Second Peter
15 And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation, even as our beloved brother Paul also, according to the wisdom given unto him, hath written unto you,
16 as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things. Therein are some things hard to understand, which those who are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other Scriptures, unto their own destruction.
But most scholars consider Second Peter not to have been even written by Peter
https://bible.org/article/authorship-second-peter
Harris says, “virtually none believe that 2 Peter was written by Jesus’ chief disciple.”2 And Brevard S. Childs, an excellent rhetorical critic, shows his assumption when he says, “even among scholars who recognize the non-Petrine authorship there remains the sharpest possible disagreement on a theological assessment.”3
So what are we left with? One dubious link to Paul, from Jesus and his followers, in the entire Bible. And yet most people follow Paul.
Thomas Jefferson: I separate therefore the gold from the dross; restore to him the former, & leave the latter to the stupidity of some, and roguery of others of his disciples. of this band of dupes and impostors, Paul was the great Coryphaeus, and first corrupter of the doctrines of Jesus.
Anyway... that's my conclusion after studying the matter in as much depth as I could find, and talking to Christian apologists.
Re: America's cyber defenses are being dismantled from the inside
#164Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mouse Utopia experiment doesn’t give mice space it’s just not the kind of restriction that’s initially obvious. The modern take is when you put animals into environments well outside what they evolved for you get seemingly bizarre behavior.
I don’t think we need a study to understand that someone who always gets everything they want is usually a spoiled brat.
But more importantly it was not happening in those experiments.
Re: America's cyber defenses are being dismantled from the inside
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would think that phrase is related to the phrase, “he who does not work, does not eat”, which is in the Bible: https://biblehub.com/2_thessalonians/3-10.htm The phrase “he who does not work, does not eat” was never intended by its author to be applied to those who were physically incapable of working. You might say otherwise, but Saint Paul had been a very traditional adherent of the Jewish faith, which had require…
Paul's teaching is plainly at odds with Jesus' teachings, and people do a lot of acrobatics to try to reconcile the two. Jesus: 25 Therefore I say unto you, Be not anxious for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than the food, and the body than the raiment? 26 Behold the birds of the heaven, that they sow not, neither do they reap, no…
Re: America's cyber defenses are being dismantled from the inside
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
He'll do anything to keep his kompromat from being disclosed.
There's no kompromat, Trump and Putin just have the same goals. This whole idea that Putin has kompromat on Trump and that's the only reason he would be deferential to Putin rests on the idea that the American president is aligned morally, politically, and strategically with the long-term interests of America. Sadly, this is not true. The oath Trump took was empty. Trump does not have a pro-America agenda; he has a p…
If something he does helps America, it is because it helps him, or because it inflates his ego via people applauding him.
Re: America's cyber defenses are being dismantled from the inside
#167Signal chats are a sideshow compared to opening up the government to data breaches and foreign influence https://www.newsweek.com/doge-whistleblower-stalked-threaten...
They don't see this. There is no true reporting. My mom didn't know about the breadth of tariffs. She didn't know about the DJT crypto scam. I've explained signal to her several times (prior to the news, just getting her to use it). She really doesn't understand anything complicated.
She "knows Trump is a jerk" but wants, and I quote, "America for Americans" and for us to put China in its place and to secure the border.
edit: I told my dad "Why do you think America is so powerful and influential? It's because we invest in the world and welcome students into this country. We aren't the center of the world for no reason". He simply replied, "We are the center of the world."
Our country is filled with people like this, incapable of abstract thought and poisoned by lies.
Re: America's cyber defenses are being dismantled from the inside
#168Signal chats are a sideshow compared to opening up the government to data breaches and foreign influence https://www.newsweek.com/doge-whistleblower-stalked-threaten...
I have conservative family who only read/watch Fox news, OAN and some conservative meme site called twitchy, which is like if Fox news tried to be dumber. They don't see this. There is no true reporting. My mom didn't know about the breadth of tariffs. She didn't know about the DJT crypto scam. I've explained signal to her several times (prior to the news, just getting her to use it). She really doesn't understand an…
Re: America's cyber defenses are being dismantled from the inside
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
While US commitment to NATO is uncertain, the rest of NATO still seems certain. Russia might be able to take the Baltic and/or Poland - but they won't be able to keep it. Soon as they cross the border (or more likely start building up) the rest of Europe will start building up their army to attack back.
A country attacks another one only if it doesn't have political control of it feels that never will. For example Russia doesn't have to attack Belarus and won't have to attack Hungary, and probably not Slovakia. They'll be part of the next Warsaw Pact without any bullet flying if their leaders will get guarantees that they can be leaders forever. Poland looked like it was going that way before the current administrat…
Re: America's cyber defenses are being dismantled from the inside
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not endorsing it, but it's roughly consistent with Trump's underlying philosophy that the international systems that USG manages are a subsidy from the US taxpayer to the rest of the world, and one which goes unappreciated. Under this premise, the USG would save money at little cost if they were replaced by industry consortiums or other countries' state initiatives. If my extrapolation is correct, even GPS might…
Let's keep things simple. You endorsed it. Here's a famous example of that endorsement style: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/56968/speech-friends-...
It doesn't seem all that simple to dictate to someone what you think their actual opinion is and then point to Shakespeare as some kind of evidence.
Maybe let's keep things simple by taking people at their word.