It wouldn’t shock me if multimodal LLMs were good at GeoGuesser [0], but if we’re being picky, it takes more than a few examples to demonstrate a game is “solved.” I also wonder what kind of data leakage might have been at play, like other people have suggested. To be clear, my point is not that this is unimpressive, just that this doesn’t demonstrate much. (Edit: I should have said, it doesn’t demonstrate what the t…
ChatGPT now performs well at GeoGuesser
31–40 of 152 posts
Re: ChatGPT now performs well at GeoGuesser
#32I guess as long as there are no major visible features (e.g. a huge mountain), and you sanitized the metadata, you will be fine (regarding ChatGPT).
Re: ChatGPT now performs well at GeoGuesser
#33Re: ChatGPT now performs well at GeoGuesser
#34Re: ChatGPT now performs well at GeoGuesser
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
"The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim." - Edsger Dijkstra
Isn’t a human brain an organic computer? I find the human brain very interesting. The most interesting thing I know of in the universe.
Clearly one's interpretation is a function of the paradigm one exists in.
Re: ChatGPT now performs well at GeoGuesser
#36somehow location tags on my photos got turned off for a bit. i would use this to restore them
Re: ChatGPT now performs well at GeoGuesser
#37Re: ChatGPT now performs well at GeoGuesser
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn’t a human brain an organic computer? I find the human brain very interesting. The most interesting thing I know of in the universe.
Religious people claim it's merely a communication device, and the computer is elsewhere. Clearly one's interpretation is a function of the paradigm one exists in.
Re: ChatGPT now performs well at GeoGuesser
#39The steam engine was invented and the 100m dash is now a solved problem.
GeoGuessr is also not a “solved problem” in the sense that if you give the model a photo of an outdoor location that is not covered by Google Street View, then it will just make an educated guess which might still be many kilometers away.
There's a lot of flat lands with spinifex in certain areas (easily a couple of United Kingdoms in size) and even a touch of mesa won't help narrow a location down from the general are as there are many of those with identical edge profiles.
But sure "Pilbara", "Kimberley", "Wheatbelt" can be geo guessed .. it's a real challenge to narrow down (I spent some time doing wet film photogrammetry prior to sheperding in WGS84 differential GPS locating and digital film and multi spectral geophysical aquisition).
No so hard if there's a few relatively unique man made features.