Live data from Hacker News

A type-safe, intuitive Go SDK for building MCP servers with ease and confidence

github.com

1–10 of 11 posts

Re: A type-safe, intuitive Go SDK for building MCP servers with ease and confidence

#4
post #2

This seems to be a better alternative: https://github.com/mark3labs/mcp-go

Yeah, mcp-go is a pretty well known project (i know it from godoc-mcp), but I don't know whether 'better' is the right word.

It looks like it's a case of builder pattern/runtime validated vs codegen/typed. The readme doesn't reference mcp-go by name, but it does lead with 'type-safe, intuitive', which could be a poke at it?

Re: A type-safe, intuitive Go SDK for building MCP servers with ease and confidence

#7
post #2

This seems to be a better alternative: https://github.com/mark3labs/mcp-go

Yeah, mcp-go is a pretty well known project (i know it from godoc-mcp), but I don't know whether 'better' is the right word. It looks like it's a case of builder pattern/runtime validated vs codegen/typed. The readme doesn't reference mcp-go by name, but it does lead with 'type-safe, intuitive', which could be a poke at it?

Do you know of anything that will autogen a golang mcp server from an OpenAPI spec? Seems completely do-able, and I'll write a tool for this myself if it doesn't already exist.

Re: A type-safe, intuitive Go SDK for building MCP servers with ease and confidence

#8
post #2

This seems to be a better alternative: https://github.com/mark3labs/mcp-go

Looks like there's also an official Go SDK coming soon, likely based on mark3labs/mcp-go. Proposal: https://github.com/orgs/modelcontextprotocol/discussions/224

Re: A type-safe, intuitive Go SDK for building MCP servers with ease and confidence

#10
post #5

Whenever I see this many emojis in a readme, I assume the entire project was written by AI.

>"Whenever I see this many emojis in a readme, I assume the entire project was written by AI."

What difference does that make? Have you read the code and formulated an actual criticism, or is this just kneejerk "AI bad"?

Post reply on HN