A type-safe, intuitive Go SDK for building MCP servers with ease and confidence
1–10 of 11 posts
Re: A type-safe, intuitive Go SDK for building MCP servers with ease and confidence
#2Re: A type-safe, intuitive Go SDK for building MCP servers with ease and confidence
#3This seems to be a better alternative: https://github.com/mark3labs/mcp-go
Re: A type-safe, intuitive Go SDK for building MCP servers with ease and confidence
#4This seems to be a better alternative: https://github.com/mark3labs/mcp-go
It looks like it's a case of builder pattern/runtime validated vs codegen/typed. The readme doesn't reference mcp-go by name, but it does lead with 'type-safe, intuitive', which could be a poke at it?
Re: A type-safe, intuitive Go SDK for building MCP servers with ease and confidence
#5Re: A type-safe, intuitive Go SDK for building MCP servers with ease and confidence
#6Whenever I see this many emojis in a readme, I assume the entire project was written by AI.
Re: A type-safe, intuitive Go SDK for building MCP servers with ease and confidence
#7This seems to be a better alternative: https://github.com/mark3labs/mcp-go
Yeah, mcp-go is a pretty well known project (i know it from godoc-mcp), but I don't know whether 'better' is the right word. It looks like it's a case of builder pattern/runtime validated vs codegen/typed. The readme doesn't reference mcp-go by name, but it does lead with 'type-safe, intuitive', which could be a poke at it?
Re: A type-safe, intuitive Go SDK for building MCP servers with ease and confidence
#8This seems to be a better alternative: https://github.com/mark3labs/mcp-go
Re: A type-safe, intuitive Go SDK for building MCP servers with ease and confidence
#9Re: A type-safe, intuitive Go SDK for building MCP servers with ease and confidence
#10Whenever I see this many emojis in a readme, I assume the entire project was written by AI.
What difference does that make? Have you read the code and formulated an actual criticism, or is this just kneejerk "AI bad"?