These four years are going to be the death of all of us.
CVE program faces swift end after DHS fails to renew contract [updated]
101–110 of 1001 posts
Re: CVE program faces swift end after DHS fails to renew contract [updated]
#102Re: CVE program faces swift end after DHS fails to renew contract [updated]
#103Earlier quoted context omitted.
important to note: the US's food safety is already really bad. salmonella isn't a thing you have to worry about in first world countries. can't wait to see what plague demon spawns out of a food industry running amok after the FDA gets gutted.
> important to note: the US's food safety is already really bad. salmonella isn't a thing you have to worry about in first world countries. There were 65,000 cases of salmonellosis in the EU in the most recent data I could find (2022). Thats a lower per capita rate than the US, but definitely not zero.
Being 26 times less worried about something translates, at least for most things, for me, to not being worried about it any more.
Re: CVE program faces swift end after DHS fails to renew contract [updated]
#104I wish this hadn't happened. I wonder what level of compartmentalisation inside DHS means they didn't see this as having sufficient downsides? I ask this, because I don't think anyone in the subject matter specialist space would have made a strong case "kill it, we don't need this" and I am sure if asked would have made a strong case "CRISSAKE WE NEED THIS DONT TOUCH IT" -But I could believe senior finance would do t…
This sort of thing is happening across the federal government. There is no rhyme or reason. DOGE has been given an unrealistic target for cuts and they're desperately cutting whatever they can get their hands on. If you look at the federal budget it's nearly impossible for DOGE to hit their stated goals without touching benefits like medicare and social security (which are off limits so far) so the only option is dee…
Re: CVE program faces swift end after DHS fails to renew contract [updated]
#105Earlier quoted context omitted.
This sort of thing is happening across the federal government. There is no rhyme or reason. DOGE has been given an unrealistic target for cuts and they're desperately cutting whatever they can get their hands on. If you look at the federal budget it's nearly impossible for DOGE to hit their stated goals without touching benefits like medicare and social security (which are off limits so far) so the only option is dee…
[flagged]
Re: CVE program faces swift end after DHS fails to renew contract [updated]
#106I wish this hadn't happened. I wonder what level of compartmentalisation inside DHS means they didn't see this as having sufficient downsides? I ask this, because I don't think anyone in the subject matter specialist space would have made a strong case "kill it, we don't need this" and I am sure if asked would have made a strong case "CRISSAKE WE NEED THIS DONT TOUCH IT" -But I could believe senior finance would do t…
Re: CVE program faces swift end after DHS fails to renew contract [updated]
#107Man, I just can’t even muster the snark I usually have for these sorts of boneheaded decisions. This sucks, plain and simple.
Re: CVE program faces swift end after DHS fails to renew contract [updated]
#108Re: CVE program faces swift end after DHS fails to renew contract [updated]
#109Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Smug, cryptic remarks aren't helpful. If you have a point, say it.
> Even my die-hard Republican distant relatives are suddenly shocked because programs they benefited from are being cut. They thought they voted for something different.
They voted for others to be hurt and to lose benefits, not their “in group.” Surprise surprise, they are considered the waste by those they voted for.
Re: CVE program faces swift end after DHS fails to renew contract [updated]
#110Weren't there major problems with the current CVE implementation, especially with the waves of script kiddies and AI tools spamming the database and the fact that projects who take security seriously have little to no say in the "score" that gets assigned?