41–50 of 1001 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think sneak would volunteer to do it since it is pretty simple according to them.
Any work people don't understand must be easy and replaceable by chatgpt. Just look at how easy people here think farming is.
I'm trying to steelman but I really can't think of a non- nefarious justification for this
We have a 2tn deficit. If Congress wants to fund this, they need to make it mandatory spending and raise taxes.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've noticed that there's a post like this in most articles on HN that could be construed as negative for the current administration: some vague false statement followed by either a factually incorrect explanation or some quote that does not support the statement.
What is incorrect about the post above? There are citations from multiple reputable news outlets for each claim. People who actually work with CVEs have been posting about this problem on HN for 18 months.
I'm trying to steelman but I really can't think of a non- nefarious justification for this
We have a 2tn deficit. If Congress wants to fund this, they need to make it mandatory spending and raise taxes.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What is incorrect about the post above? There are citations from multiple reputable news outlets for each claim. People who actually work with CVEs have been posting about this problem on HN for 18 months.
Your post has now been edited to be factually correct. But the misleading implication that this abrupt cut is part of some other cuts that started before remains.
This sucks, plain and simple.
What are the implications of this? No more centralized store of vulnerability information?
If I'm developing a product built on 20 libraries, it won't just be a matter of scanning CVEs for major vulnerabilities any more, so I'm more likely to miss one.
"always update" doesn't always work, when to manage a product you realistically have to version pin.