Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a lot of useless junk that's cleared by association
Are you saying he only took meaningless stuff? Lol.
U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat
301–310 of 1001 posts
Re: U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat
#302Re: U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat
#303> In his text detailing aspects of the forthcoming attack on Houthi targets, Hegseth wrote to the group—which, at the time, included me—“We are currently clean on OPSEC.” Simply incredible. This is wild.
he said similar thing on his confirmation hearing "My commitment is to not touch alcohol while I have this position"
Re: U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat
#304Earlier quoted context omitted.
SO much for 'the most transparent administration in history', not that I bought into that claim in the first place. Seems like a violation of multiple public record-keeping laws.
Trump's razor: The opposite of what he says is closer to the truth.
Re: U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat
#305In the banking world, employees have been fined significant sums, or even forced from their jobs [0], for unauthorized use of messaging platforms. And here, it's barely a shrug. Unbelievable. [0] https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/morgan-stanley-hit-...
Re: U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat
#306Earlier quoted context omitted.
SO much for 'the most transparent administration in history', not that I bought into that claim in the first place. Seems like a violation of multiple public record-keeping laws.
"But her e-mails." > It’s best to understand that fascists see hypocrisy as a virtue. It’s how they signal that the things they are doing to people were never meant to be equally applied. > It’s not an inconsistency. It’s very consistent to the only true fascist value, which is domination. > It’s very important to understand, fascists don’t just see hypocrisy as a necessary evil or an unintended side-effect. > It’s t…
Re: U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat
#307Could've been a setup to get The Atlantic to leak government secrets...
Re: U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat
#308In the banking world, employees have been fined significant sums, or even forced from their jobs [0], for unauthorized use of messaging platforms. And here, it's barely a shrug. Unbelievable. [0] https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/morgan-stanley-hit-...
Re: U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat
#309This is bad news for entire genres of books, TV shows and movies that are based on the supreme competence, sophistication and wealth of the Pentagon, NSA and CIA. Turns out US military strategy is the same as me and my mates setting up a bar date. It's a disturbing leak in itself but i take issue with the journalist obsessing over the tool of choice whilst ignoring the actual strategizing. The casual way in which a m…
Agencies with no oversight are seen as competent? That's news to me. There's a definite waste of taxpayer dollars on propaganda to try to make this point publicly but I didn't think anyone was poorly educated enough to actually believe it.
Re: U.S. national-security leaders included me in a group chat
#310Earlier quoted context omitted.
Almost as bad as a private email server being used for governmental business.
No, that was intentional. This incident was an accident.