181–190 of 303 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And it’s quite easy to set up a Cloudflare tunnel to make your open-webui instance accessible online too just you
... or a TailScale network. I've been leaving open-webui running on my laptop on my desk and then going out into the word and accessing it from my phone via TailScale, works great.
Big day for open source Chinese model releases - DeepSeek-v3-0324 came out today too, an updated version of DeepSeek v3 now under an MIT license (previously it was a custom DeepSeek license). https://simonwillison.net/2025/Mar/24/deepseek/
And it still can't answer this: Q: "9.11 and 9.9, which one is larger?" A: "To determine which number is larger between 9.11 and 9.9, let's compare them step by step. Both numbers have the same whole number part: 9. 9.11 has a 1 in the tenths place. 9.9 has a 9 in the tenths place. Since 9 (from 9.9) is greater than 1 (from 9.11), we can conclude that 9.9 is larger than 9.11." "Final Answer: 9.9" I don't think anythi…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nah, it's great for things that Western models are censored on. The True Hacker will keep an Eastern and Western model available, depending on what they need information on.
I tried to ask it about Java exploits that would allow me to gain RCE, but it refused just as most western models do. That was the only thing I could think to ask really. Do you have a better example maybe?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And it still can't answer this: Q: "9.11 and 9.9, which one is larger?" A: "To determine which number is larger between 9.11 and 9.9, let's compare them step by step. Both numbers have the same whole number part: 9. 9.11 has a 1 in the tenths place. 9.9 has a 9 in the tenths place. Since 9 (from 9.9) is greater than 1 (from 9.11), we can conclude that 9.9 is larger than 9.11." "Final Answer: 9.9" I don't think anythi…
This is hilarious, especially if it's unintentional.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I asked o1-pro what 99490126816810951552*23977364624054235203 is, yesterday. It took 16 minutes to get an answer which is off by eight orders of magnitude. https://chatgpt.com/share/67e1eba1-c658-800e-9161-a0b8b7b683...
Sorry, I'm in a rush, could only afford a couple minutes looking at it, but I'm missing something: Google: 2.385511e+39 Your chat: "Numerically, that’s about 2.3855 × 10^39" Also curious how you think about LLM-as-calculator in relation to tool calls.
> Also curious how you think about LLM-as-calculator in relation to tool calls.
I just tried this because I heard all existing models are bad at this kind of problem, and wanted to try it with the most powerful one I have access to. I think it shows that you really want an AI to be able to use computational tools in appropriate circumstances.
Big day for open source Chinese model releases - DeepSeek-v3-0324 came out today too, an updated version of DeepSeek v3 now under an MIT license (previously it was a custom DeepSeek license). https://simonwillison.net/2025/Mar/24/deepseek/
And it still can't answer this: Q: "9.11 and 9.9, which one is larger?" A: "To determine which number is larger between 9.11 and 9.9, let's compare them step by step. Both numbers have the same whole number part: 9. 9.11 has a 1 in the tenths place. 9.9 has a 9 in the tenths place. Since 9 (from 9.9) is greater than 1 (from 9.11), we can conclude that 9.9 is larger than 9.11." "Final Answer: 9.9" I don't think anythi…
Will this humbling moment change your opinion?