Earlier quoted context omitted.
32B don't fully fit 16GB of VRAM. Still fine for higher quality answers, worth the extra wait in some cases.
Would a 40GB A6000 fully accommodate a 32B model? I assume an fp16 quantization is still necessary?
Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
111–120 of 303 posts
Re: Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
#112Silly question: how can OpenAI, Claude and all, have a valuation so large considering all the open source models? Not saying they will disappear or be tiny (closed models), but why so so so valuable?
Re: Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
#113Silly question: how can OpenAI, Claude and all, have a valuation so large considering all the open source models? Not saying they will disappear or be tiny (closed models), but why so so so valuable?
Re: Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
#114I've run the smallest model in non-quantized format, but when I've tried to run a AWQ version of one of the bigger models I've struggled to find a combination of libraries that works right - even though it should fit on my GPU.
Re: Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
At FP16 you‘d need 64GB just for the weights, and it‘d be 2x as slow as a Q8 version, likely with little improvement. You‘ll also need space for attention and context etc, so 80-100GB (or even more) VRAM would be better. Many people „just“ use 4x consumer GPUs like the 3090 (24GB each) which scales well. They’d probably buy a mining rig, EPYC CPU, Mainboard with sufficient PCIe lanes, PCIe risers, 1600W PSU (might ne…
I haven't found a good case/risers/etc I really like. Most the miner stuff wasn't made for PCIe 16x.
> So at FP16 precision that's a grand total of 16 kB you're transmitting over the PCIe bus, once per token. If you multiply by, say, 20 tokens per second, then you're still only using like 0.1% of your PCIe bandwidth.
Intra GPU memory bandwidth is very important, but I‘ve seen lots of people use just a x4 lane and they didn’t complain much.
Re: Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
#116Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are there any good sources that I can read up on estimiating what would be hardware specs required for 7B, 13B, 32B .. etc size If I need to run them locally? I am grad student on budget but I want to host one locally and trying to build a PC that could run one of these models.
"B" just means "billion". A 7B model has 7 billion parameters. Most models are trained in fp16, so each parameter takes two bytes at full precision. Therefore, 7B = 14GB of memory. You can easily quantize models to 8 bits per parameter with very little quality loss, so then 7B = 7GB of memory. With more quality loss (making the model dumber), you can quantize to 4 bits per parameter, so 7B = 3.5GB of memory. There ar…
Re: Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
#117Re: Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
At FP16 you‘d need 64GB just for the weights, and it‘d be 2x as slow as a Q8 version, likely with little improvement. You‘ll also need space for attention and context etc, so 80-100GB (or even more) VRAM would be better. Many people „just“ use 4x consumer GPUs like the 3090 (24GB each) which scales well. They’d probably buy a mining rig, EPYC CPU, Mainboard with sufficient PCIe lanes, PCIe risers, 1600W PSU (might ne…
would it be better for energy efficiency and overall performance to use workstation cards like A5000 or A4000? Those can be found on eBay.
Re: Qwen2.5-VL-32B: Smarter and Lighter
#119Earlier quoted context omitted.
good grief! people are okay with it when OpenAI and Google do it, but as soon as open source providers do it, people get defensive about it...
I trust big companies far more with my data than small ones. Big companies have so much data they won't be having a human look at mine specifically. Some small place probably has the engineer looking at my logs as user #4. Also, big companies have security teams whose job is securing the data, and it won't be going over some unencrypted link to cloudflare because OP was too lazy to set up Https certs.