Security is a two way street: both the user, as well as the company have a responsibility.
When i claimed certain high target technological companies have a zero incident grade, im talking about the fact the companies were never themselves the weak link.
If this guys account was hacked because he tattoos his password on his forehead, Apple too would be in the clear. But here, not the user, but the company screwed up.
There are many, many companies which do not have incidents, or take full responsibility when they do. The type of incidents we complain about, often indicate just gross negliance. (and this is gross negliance by Apple)
You are repeating the claim that there is no watertight security. This claim is wrong. Software can be provably secure. Authentification can be provably secure, just like any type of Content protection is provably unsecure.
Now, you are also making the claim, that we are talking about this, because of the affected users popularity.
Maybe thats why you are talking about it. But most of us are actually surprised because of the gross negliance. ICloud has no authentification, one can just call up, and take over the account. As we now know.
And if this was any other company, i doubt anyone would argue against this obvious and pretty much indisputable fact. But this isnt Sony, this is Apple, and they can never do anything wrong right? Eventhough, statistically, just like any other company, they might could not excel in every way. Maybe this is just one area, where they just screwed up?
Theyll learn from it, hopefully. But lets not pretend it didnt happen, or that it isnt as big as a fuckup as it actually is, back here in reality.