Live data from Hacker News

The Alexa feature "do not send voice recordings" you enabled no longer available

discuss.systems

71–80 of 696 posts

Re: The Alexa feature "do not send voice recordings" you enabled no longer available

#71
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah right. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/jul/26/apple-con...

Your link does not contradict his.

The link is still relevant, because apple's statement is posted in a manner antithetical to the article when, in fact, apple does the same thing.

The main difference is that apple didn't allow its users to have such a setting in the first place, so amazon used to be better. Until now, when they're equally bad in this respect.

Re: The Alexa feature "do not send voice recordings" you enabled no longer available

#73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you buy the steering wheel of a car and rent the rest of the car and then the owner comes in the middle of the night and takes the wheels, is it theft?

It's certainly a violation of the rental terms.

It's on page 52.

Re: The Alexa feature "do not send voice recordings" you enabled no longer available

#74
post #24
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don't these usually come with ToS or something that has you agreeing that they can change the service any time?

When you buy a car there is a lot of required paperwork that they don't really give you time to read, so maybe.

You shouldn't sign things you don't read. Cue the centipad.

Re: The Alexa feature "do not send voice recordings" you enabled no longer available

#75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you buy the steering wheel of a car and rent the rest of the car and then the owner comes in the middle of the night and takes the wheels, is it theft?

It's certainly a violation of the rental terms.

Rental terms were 1000 page book.

Re: The Alexa feature "do not send voice recordings" you enabled no longer available

#76

Am I supposed to have sympathy for people who bought a home snooping device now realizing they're going to be snooped on?

Yes because it damages one's own morals and can increase the likelihood in the future to be the one to exploit "suckers" for profit.

We can still say "I told you so" and have sympathy. But we shouldn't throw the sympathy away in contempt. Another reason is that over our life at least once we will be the suckers, and will look on those who said "i told you so" and see contempt in their eyes. Is that what we want?

Re: The Alexa feature "do not send voice recordings" you enabled no longer available

#79

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's certainly a violation of the rental terms.

It's on page 52.

Actually, it's first implied on page 23, but it becomes clear in conjunction with the articles on pages 48 and 49.

The article you're referring to on page 52 has provisions regarding confusion and/or impersonation, following the previously mentioned positive affirmation.

You need the full context of the T&C's, don't cherry pick.

Re: The Alexa feature "do not send voice recordings" you enabled no longer available

#80
post #23

I switched to Home Assistant a couple months ago (because I didn't like the idea of my voice being sent to amazon constantly) and haven't looked back! Soo much more you can do (including immediately using an LLM, if you like, whether in the cloud or local), and so much more control.

I am switching out the Alexas in the house to the home assistant voice devices, which can leverage a local LLM without any cloud whatsoever

https://www.home-assistant.io/voice-pe/

The process is still complicated enough to be "enthusiast" (aka nerd) territory but it is getting better with every release. It will still be here in 10 years, nobody can take it away from us.

Post reply on HN