Live data from Hacker News

Samsung Q990D unresponsive after 1020 firmware update

us.community.samsung.com

331–340 of 580 posts

Re: Samsung Q990D unresponsive after 1020 firmware update

#331
post #301

Should be codified by law: - If a firmware can be updated, it must keep a minimum ROM feature so it can be recovered. - No device should be updated without the *owner* explicit intention to do so. - Full docs must be released if the vendor stops supporting it.

A law? As an engineer, I really don’t want a bunch of technologically-inept congressmen telling me how I have to build software, firmware, or hardware.

Found the guy who wants to talk about traffic lights without a license.

https://ij.org/press-release/oregon-engineer-wins-traffic-li...

Re: Samsung Q990D unresponsive after 1020 firmware update

#332
post #224

They did this before, about five years ago. I had to send it back to them for a fix and it came back a few weeks later. https://hackaday.com/2020/07/19/the-real-story-how-samsung-b...

Yeah, some people say they got replacements through the warranty. The problem is, this thing is really big and heavy, so boxing it up is a real pain, especially if you've had it a while and already threw out the original box.

That's why my buddy said it's time to buy shares in bubble wrap

Re: Samsung Q990D unresponsive after 1020 firmware update

#333

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Exactly. If your company's threat model considers its own customers as attackers, you're the baddies.

Not always. There's a time and a place for including end users in your threat model. These would include scholastic and carceral settings, where in both cases the end user may, as an example, desire access to resources that have been deemed inappropriate.

> scholastic and carceral

Same thing.

> deemed inappropriate

Ooh! Deeming! Can I deem too? Huh? Can I? I have a number of candidates.

Re: Samsung Q990D unresponsive after 1020 firmware update

#335
post #237

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Why else would a soundbar need updates anyway? No matter the device, software rots. Not because the device changes, not because the software changes, but because the world does

And the obvious solution is to isolate the device from the world. Most of my stereo is isolated from “the world”, and some parts are close to 30 years old. Why does a soundbar need contact with the internet?

Why does a soundbar need software? An active speaker with a jack plug would work just fine

Re: Samsung Q990D unresponsive after 1020 firmware update

#337
post #209

I hate smart TVs. Why put all the functionality in one device when a small part of it is going to become obsolete real soon while the TV part will continue to work for a decade or more. I buy dumb TVs and a separate "smart" component like Roku that can be replaced as easily as a shoelace.

This post is about a soundbar, not a smart TV.

Re: Samsung Q990D unresponsive after 1020 firmware update

#338
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wouldn’t radio silence increase damages to customers and result in increased liability?

Remember when Crowdstrike crashed half the computers on the planet for a full day? Well, if you do, you're one of the few, because people are still using Crowdstrike, and the stock is still doing well overall.

It’s still one of the best antimalwares on the planet.

Re: Samsung Q990D unresponsive after 1020 firmware update

#339
post #209

I hate smart TVs. Why put all the functionality in one device when a small part of it is going to become obsolete real soon while the TV part will continue to work for a decade or more. I buy dumb TVs and a separate "smart" component like Roku that can be replaced as easily as a shoelace.

I lump modern TV bullshit (crappy "smart" features, motion smoothing, horrible default settings) in with modern car bullshit (huge touchscreens everywhere, the near total death of real physical controls).

Everyone you speak to at best is ambivalent and at worst vehemently hates it. And yet there's no sign of it slowing down. It's baffling.

Re: Samsung Q990D unresponsive after 1020 firmware update

#340

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I hate this idea that software "rots" all by itself when it's just left on a device and is impossible to keep working. I would at the very, very least expect my device to work exactly as it did on day one, for the next 50 years, assuming I don't change the software. It's bits on a flash drive! It doesn't rot, outside some freak cosmic ray from space flipping a bit. If you're saying the software stops working because…

Certificates expire.

So don't burn CA pubkeys into your binaries without means for user override. If the software can persist a user-specific analytics ID it can support user certs. This is a solved problem.
Post reply on HN