>> In the proposal, OpenAI also said the U.S. needs “a copyright strategy that promotes the freedom to learn” and on “preserving American AI models’ ability to learn from copyrighted material.” Perhaps also symmetric "freedom to learn" from OpenAI models, with some provisions / naming convention? U.S. labs are limited in this way, while labs in China are not.
OpenAI asks White House for relief from state AI rules
41–50 of 845 posts
Re: OpenAI asks White House for relief from state AI rules
#42States have the power to make it prohibitively expensive to operate in those states, leaving people to either go to VPNs or use AI's hosted in other countries where they don't care if they're not following whatever new AI law California decides to pass. And companies would choose just to use datacenters not in the prohibitive states and ban ips from those states.
Course if a company hosts in us-east-1, and allows access from California, would the inter state commerce clause not take effect and California would have no power anyways?
Re: OpenAI asks White House for relief from state AI rules
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
centralising power never works well for the good of society
That's correct. Voluntary association advocated by anarchy is the only truly free social model.
Forget what they called it, united something or other.
Re: OpenAI asks White House for relief from state AI rules
#44Re: OpenAI asks White House for relief from state AI rules
#45Re: OpenAI asks White House for relief from state AI rules
#46Re: OpenAI asks White House for relief from state AI rules
#47Re: OpenAI asks White House for relief from state AI rules
#48>> In the proposal, OpenAI also said the U.S. needs “a copyright strategy that promotes the freedom to learn” and on “preserving American AI models’ ability to learn from copyrighted material.” Perhaps also symmetric "freedom to learn" from OpenAI models, with some provisions / naming convention? U.S. labs are limited in this way, while labs in China are not.
Re: OpenAI asks White House for relief from state AI rules
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
I would assume that the request is for it to apply to models in the way that it currently applies to humans. If a human buys a movie, he can watch it and learn about its contents, and then talk about those contents, and he can create a similar movie with a similar theme. If OpenAI buys a movie and shows it to their model, it's unclear whether the model can talk about the contents of the movie and create a similar mov…
Is OpenAI buying the movie, or just taking it? Since "buying" a movie (as it currently applies to humans) is just buying a limited license to it for private viewing, can't the copyright holder opt to limit the $4.99 license terms to human viewing, and charge $4999 for an AI training license? Or OpenAI could buy movies the way Disney does, by buying the actual copyright to the film.
the Reddit data licensing model
Re: OpenAI asks White House for relief from state AI rules
#50I know a lot of people will hate on things like this, but the reality is they are right that guardrails only serve to hurt us in the long run, at least at this pivotal point in time. I don't like Trump personally as a caveat. Yes it is a fact they did build themselves up on top of mountains of copyrighted material, and that AI has a lot of potential to do harm, but if they are forced to stop or slow down foreign acto…
What evidence led you to that conclusion?