Live data from Hacker News

DOGE's government cuts may hurt business, companies warn investors

washingtonpost.com

51–53 of 53 posts

Re: DOGE's government cuts may hurt business, companies warn investors

#51
post #6

I'm looking for predictive economic models out in the open. I want to see the underlying assumptions and experiment. I'm not even picky about the kind of model: it could be a relatively simple linear regression model, a systems dynamics model, a complex simulation, or anything in-between. I just want models to a focal point of discussion rather than some poorly-explained textual interpretation. I know... I'm asking f…

A follow up idea: Don’t forget we modelers are still in a phase that might be characterized as “shifting mindsets”. The capability to model is getting steadily better, but I don’t think the practice of modeling is anywhere close to maturity nor broad diffusion.

I was hopeful ~5-10 years ago with the rise of data science, but I don’t know how much this growth corresponded with decision makers using the models both broadly and in intellectually honest ways.

There are areas where the results seem clear; e.g. advertising and product-specific decision points, such as recommendation engines.

Beyond these short-term ML applications, there are other domains where modeling is essential: weather forecasting, politics, markets, economics. But this is just the tip of the iceberg.

Here is a metric I’m interested in: what percentage of decisions are informed by quantitative models?

Aside: Before you complain that e.g. “some decisions aren’t impactful enough to warrant a model-backed approach”, let me say that I sort of agree, but… There are indeed lightweight quantitative models (or at least processes) that can track / predict when using a heavier model is worth it!

I don’t have systematic data on this; it is just a hunch, inspired by what I have heard and seen.

Why? Effective modeling provides differential advantages.

-intra-organizational diffusion: technically savvy people will rise into management.

- inter-organizational dispersion: techniques used by winners will spread across organizations and industries.

Re: DOGE's government cuts may hurt business, companies warn investors

#52
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't have any insights on specific models that are "out there", but I'll share one tidbit you might find of interest if you're not already familiar with it. Douglas Hubbard's "Applied Information Economics"[1] is a methodology that could probably be applied to doing what you're asking for. Is it the only such methodology? Almost certainly not. Is it the best? I really don't know, as I think the scope of what you'r…

Thanks. From the linked page I only see a marketing page that sells the general ideas. It looks like the common pattern where a consultancy sells their expertise, perhaps with a differentiating advantage that their analysis is backed by a quantitative model that has been refined over time. I don’t know how they work, but they probably custom build or tailor their in-house model and provide the results and interpretat…

There's no "model" there, just a methodology. Hubbard does consulting and sells books, that's how he monetizes this as far as I know. His book How to Measure Anything[1] lays out the core ideas in sufficient detail for somebody to implement the basic idea. A used copy could be acquired for [1]: https://www.amazon.com/How-Measure-Anything-Intangibles-Busi...

Re: DOGE's government cuts may hurt business, companies warn investors

#53
post #41

I think what they're doing is long overdue. The abuse and corruption already exposed proves it. The net savings to taxpayers far outweighs any business losses from what I've gathered.

> The abuse and corruption already exposed proves it. I have yet to see a significant amount of this exposed.

Follow DOGE on x.com to see the $billions upon $billions redeemed for taxpayers:

https://x.com/DOGE

Post reply on HN