Earlier quoted context omitted.
But is less capable than uBlock origin.
And also requires far less intrusive permissions.
uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store
831–840 of 1001 posts
Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store
#832Earlier quoted context omitted.
What boggles my mind is the fact that surely people working for Google also use Chrome. Are they not up in arms internally because of how awful the web is without ad blocker? I have the same experience as you, every time I set up a new machine or watch friends/relatives browse the web, it just blows my mind how bad the unfiltered internet is.
I wouldn't be surprised if the people that did care about that internally at Google either used something like Firefox or had their private build that can run uBlock or similar ;)
Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store
#833Earlier quoted context omitted.
Slippery slope corporate apologism. It's like a corporation shrinking the package size of your food by 10%, keeping the price the same and then claiming you still get the "majority" of the food.
Or just accurately describing reality? UBOL is still blocking all the ads for me. It hasn't gone from 100% to 90%. It's still at 100%.
Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store
#834Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Then they would let people contribute money to the browser People keep saying things like this, but the truth is that direct contributions to any ad-supported system contribute more like 1%-10% (at best) of their income. You are not the majority you think you are.
It does not have to be the majority. It would suffice to produce enough funds to continue developing Firefox, with full-time engineers, infrastructure, etc. The whole Mozilla foundation budget oscillated around $100-120M/y for last few years. Let's assume that half of it was dedicated to Firefox; e.g. $60M/y. It would take 500k users paying $120/y (aka $10/mo) to support their favorite browser. The current audience o…
Firefox is under corporation, not foundation. Mozilla Corporation expenses are $400M+, not $100M.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Corporation#Finances
(I don't enough knowledge about freemium economics to figure out if the stated numbers would work out or not)
Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store
#835Earlier quoted context omitted.
What boggles my mind is the fact that surely people working for Google also use Chrome. Are they not up in arms internally because of how awful the web is without ad blocker? I have the same experience as you, every time I set up a new machine or watch friends/relatives browse the web, it just blows my mind how bad the unfiltered internet is.
Enterprise editions of Chrome continue to have manifest v2 support, so this doesn't necessarily affect Google employees.
Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store
#836Earlier quoted context omitted.
Enterprise editions of Chrome continue to have manifest v2 support, so this doesn't necessarily affect Google employees.
Guess I know what I'm deploying in my enterprise of one seat.
Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store
#837Earlier quoted context omitted.
> kinda like running Windos applications in Wine Sometimes works better than on the original Windows? I assume that's not what you meant though :-)
I could have meant that. Doesn't Firefox sometimes work better than Chrome?
But you know better than anyone's else what you meant :-)
Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store
#838I hear so many people IRL complaining about this. I tell them to switch to firefox, that the adblockers still work there, and they still won't switch to it because they are "used to chrome". I really feel like google won this battle. People will through a lot of abuse just to maintain their habits.
People didn't switch from IE to Chrome because it was better. They switched because it was MUCH, MUCH better. (And was part of the ecosystem, profiles, bookmarks, passwords, etc.) --- For better or worse, no such disparity exists currently.
From where I was sitting, Firefox grew from word of mouth. Friends old friends, or simply installed it for them and said “trust me”. And people were shamed for using IE.
Over time Firefox started to feel more bloated, and Chrome was new, lean, and fast.
Chrome then went through its own bloat phase, and now this.
Browser monopolies have toppled before, through various means. I see no reason why it can’t happen again. Currently Apple is pretty much single handedly keeping Google from having total control, by only allowing WebKit on iOS.
I have a feeling people would be more likely to switch to a new player than to run back to an old one they left once before.
Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store
#839Earlier quoted context omitted.
macOS only
Linux is coming, but that still leaves Windows and Android (and iOS?) out.
Re: uBlock Origin is no longer available on the Chrome Store
#840Earlier quoted context omitted.
And developers can play a part in reversing that. It seems like it might already be happening: | month | Chrome | Firefox | Safari | | -- | -- | -- | -- | | Jan '25 | -1.29 | +0.07 | +0.84 | | Feb '25 | -0.75 | +0.08 | +0.03 | Note: Edge is also gaining. They use Chromium but their stance on Manifest v3 is unclear to me. So far they don't seem to have any plans to deprecate v2 support I know these numbers seem tiny,…
> but if these trends were to continue Disco Stu has something to say about that