I genuinely wish there was an understandable endgame for the USA. The USA seems to be throwing its weight around but I’m not entirely sure to what end. This headline/article is just one area where the US is behaving perplexingly. I understand that Trump wants Zelenskyy to sign the minerals deal and that implicitly there’s security guarantees. Fine there’s at least a through line. However; by demonstrating that the US…
NATO as has existed is already over. Nobody has any faith that the US will follow through on its Article 5 obligations.
US Ends Support For Ukrainian F-16s
121–130 of 1001 posts
Re: US Ends Support For Ukrainian F-16s
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Donald wants Groenland ... After that, why not Denmark itself ?
> After that, why not Denmark itself ? Hmm, the US welcome to liberate us from sour tax burden. I suspect the invading force will surrender when they see the liabilities :)
Re: US Ends Support For Ukrainian F-16s
#123Earlier quoted context omitted.
Trump doesn't care about anyone but himself. The only reason he ran for president again (a job he absolutely hated the first time around) was so he would stay out of jail for the myriad of crimes he committed. Now that he actually got reelected (us Americans can be incredibly dumb) he's doing everything he can to punish everyone he deems was "out to get him". Also he adores Putin and Xi and is doing what he can to be…
[flagged]
It worked, didn't it? Every prosecutor just quit soon after Trump was elected.
Re: US Ends Support For Ukrainian F-16s
#124I genuinely wish there was an understandable endgame for the USA. The USA seems to be throwing its weight around but I’m not entirely sure to what end. This headline/article is just one area where the US is behaving perplexingly. I understand that Trump wants Zelenskyy to sign the minerals deal and that implicitly there’s security guarantees. Fine there’s at least a through line. However; by demonstrating that the US…
> I understand that Trump wants Zelenskyy to sign the minerals deal and that implicitly there’s security guarantees. I don't think there are any "security guarantees". What could they be? The "endgame" as far as I understand it: The US wants access to the minerals as a compensation for the money already spent and, perhaps, to restore some of the support currently put on hold (satellite data access). Once the Ukranian…
That said, I don’t know what more Ukraine would want given the Budapest Memorandum already ties the USA, UK, and Russia to Ukraine’s defense. That’s proven to be a mixed success, as both USA, UK, and other countries have indeed stepped up for Ukraine’s defense.
Re: US Ends Support For Ukrainian F-16s
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
Especially F-35 where lack of American support means total brick. Hey, at least Ukraine can use their S-300 systems and Sukhois against their maker.
This is top of mind for all European countries that bought the F-35. They are painfully aware of this. So is the US defense industry which will notice softening sales kicking in a few years down the line as European countries are less inclined to buy US arms. This was predictable though. The markets have already rewarded those who saw this coming.
Or maybe Europeans, as "founding members", are able to support the planes on their own? I doubt it though. The engine alone is US made, ans that alone is probably unmaintainable without their support.
Re: US Ends Support For Ukrainian F-16s
#126@dang - why flagged?
Re: US Ends Support For Ukrainian F-16s
#127Re: US Ends Support For Ukrainian F-16s
#128Also it could explain this stuff which is hard otherwise.
Re: US Ends Support For Ukrainian F-16s
#129I genuinely wish there was an understandable endgame for the USA. The USA seems to be throwing its weight around but I’m not entirely sure to what end. This headline/article is just one area where the US is behaving perplexingly. I understand that Trump wants Zelenskyy to sign the minerals deal and that implicitly there’s security guarantees. Fine there’s at least a through line. However; by demonstrating that the US…
NATO as has existed is already over. Nobody has any faith that the US will follow through on its Article 5 obligations.
Re: US Ends Support For Ukrainian F-16s
#130[flagged]
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzgPJeYZaOU The second video repeats the same argument: the "NATO's eastward march". Putin says Russia had to start the war in Ukraine to stop NATO from expanding too close (he failed as two more countries joined NATO). But when you dig one "why?" deeper you can understand that NATO is not a self-aware entity that expands and threats, it's an alliance of countries that realize that i…
Expansion, colonization, power and wealth. Classic