I'm a little worried this site will go the way of reddit...
The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race (by Jared Diamond)
31–40 of 46 posts
Re: The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race (by Jared Diamond)
#32Re: The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race (by Jared Diamond)
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't read reddit, anyway, I guess it takes time to find out what is considered appropiate for the new hacker news. I went by the definition of "is not shown on TV". It's 20 years old, but old articles have been posted before, and I only found it today... If nobody is interested, nobody will mod it up? Besides, I thought this article also relates to startupping, because of the average work hours aspect. But granted…
It's not that bad a link... it just seems so drastic a change:-/ It seems also to illustrate that the intersection of interesting startup links is very well defined, whereas the intersection of interesting 'hacker news' is rather less well defined, and will probably be more prone to disagreement, even if the people posting are the same ones as with the old yc.news, because our interests and beliefs are likely to be q…
Obviously hackers have found this interesting, but I agree it is on the border of being irrelevant. I think it is useful to use PG's rule of thumb that if it's covered on TV news then it's off topic which I think this is an exception to.
I like this new direction that yc is taking, the site was rather boring to me before which I barely frequented until I saw that it changed on reddit.
I shouldn't come here to often because each time I read something by PG I feel like quitting my job and starting a company.
Re: The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race (by Jared Diamond)
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
>>It turns out that these people have plenty of leisure time, sleep a good deal, and work less hard than their farming neighbors. For instance, the average time devoted each week to obtaining food is only 12 to 19 hours for one group of Bushmen, 14 hours or less for the Hadza nomads of Tanzania. FTA... please read it :p You can make the argument that by increasing population size and crowding, it also made collaborat…
I think it is moreso the ability to settle in one place that caused the growth of technology. The hunter-gatherers, no matter how numerous, certainly did not spend their free time building forges and experimenting with metal. Also note that the time spent gathering food likely does not include preparing to gather food (e.g.: making weapons). Although they could spend plenty of time playing games, note that games orig…
"Another misconception is that there is necesarrily a sharp divide between nomadic hunter-gatherers and sedentary food producers. In reality, although we frequently develop such a contrast, hunter-gathers in some productive areas, including North America's Pacific Northwest coast and possibly southeastern Australia, became sedentary but never became food producers. Other hunter-gatherers, in Palestine, costal Peru, and Japan, became sedentary first and adopted food production much later. Sedentary groups probably made up a much higher fraction 15,000 years ago, when all inhabited parts of the world (including the most productive areas) were still occupied by hunter-gatherers, than they do today, when the few remaining hunter-gathers survive only in unproductive areas where nomadism is the sole option.
Conversely, there are mobile groups of food producers. Some modern nomads of New Guinea's Lake Plains made clearings in the jungle, plant bananas and papayas, go off for a few months to live again as hunter-gatherers, return to check on their crops, weed the garden if they find the crops growing, set off again to hunt, return months later to check again, and settle down for a while to harvest and eat if their garden has not produced. Apache Indians of the southwestern United States settled down to farm in the summer at high elevations and toward the north, then withdrew to the south and to lower elevations to wander in search of wild foods, during the winter. Many herding peoples of Africa and Asia shift camp along regular seasonal routes to take advantage of predictable seasonal changes in pasturage. Thus, the shift from hunting-gathering to food production did not always coincide with a shift from nomadism to sedentary living."
(Guns, Germs, and Steel p. 106)
Re: The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race (by Jared Diamond)
#35Anyone who thinks hunter gatherers had pleasant lives should stop to think what happened to people who were too old to follow the tribe when it moved, or what happened when a mother who was already nursing had another baby.
Anyway, the point is certainly not to recommend going back to a hunter gatherer lifestyle. Although I wonder if startupping is not somewhat akin to hunting.
Re: The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race (by Jared Diamond)
#36Anyone who thinks hunter gatherers had pleasant lives should stop to think what happened to people who were too old to follow the tribe when it moved, or what happened when a mother who was already nursing had another baby.
Re: The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race (by Jared Diamond)
#37I can't believe this article was up-voted. What does this have to do with hacking or startups??? I'm a little worried this site will go the way of reddit...
Obviously it won't interest everybody, but didn't pg say "anything that interests hackers", not only hacking itself?
Anyway, my apologies if it was too far stretched. I hope I will refrain from further submissions in the future. Perhaps I should check out Reddit...
Re: The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race (by Jared Diamond)
#38It's a life that philosophers have traditionally regarded as nasty, brutish, and short.
Um, Jean Jacques Rousseau? Noble Savage? Only a few decades after Hobbes?
It may not be relevant to the case being made here, but come on. I remember writing "compare and contrast" papers on Hobbes and Rousseau in high school.
Re: The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race (by Jared Diamond)
#39Massive self-aggrandizing factual error in the third paragraph: It's a life that philosophers have traditionally regarded as nasty, brutish, and short. Um, Jean Jacques Rousseau? Noble Savage? Only a few decades after Hobbes? It may not be relevant to the case being made here, but come on . I remember writing "compare and contrast" papers on Hobbes and Rousseau in high school.
http://www.thecourier.com/manifest.htm
It sort of bothers me that this is getting upmodded--not because it's off-topic, but because it's so painfully banal--every high schooler has already thought these things through completely, just like this: