Live data from Hacker News

AMD RDNA 4 – AMD Radeon RX 9000 Series Graphics Cards

amd.com

71–80 of 191 posts

Re: AMD RDNA 4 – AMD Radeon RX 9000 Series Graphics Cards

#71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

These cards are $550-$600 16GB is great for what these are: Gaming cards. Even on the nVidia side you have to spend $2000 (likely more) to get more RAM than that. You could buy 3 of these for the price of a single nVidia 5090.

On the Nvidia side every GPU released in the last ten years competes against what AMD is doing today. People who need more VRAM go with dual 3090.

For the low low price of $2.5k you can outcompete a $600 card. Wow.

Re: AMD RDNA 4 – AMD Radeon RX 9000 Series Graphics Cards

#72
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am not surprised, ROCm focuses on CDNA. Was RDNA in ROCm ever officially supported?

My 6900 XT has had pretty good support in everything I've tried.

But it didn't launch with AMD support, it is support now.

Re: AMD RDNA 4 – AMD Radeon RX 9000 Series Graphics Cards

#73
post #54

So about 20% better value than Nvidia comparing MSRPs. Not terrible but that’s what they offered last generation and got 10% market share as a result. If the market price of Nvidia cards remains 20-50% above MSRP while AMD can hit their prices, then maybe we have a ballgame.

5070xt will likely be at $800-850 with my local/import tax while 5070ti is now at $1200-1300.

Re: AMD RDNA 4 – AMD Radeon RX 9000 Series Graphics Cards

#74
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am not surprised, ROCm focuses on CDNA. Was RDNA in ROCm ever officially supported?

RX 7900 (RDNA 3 flagships) are officially supported. I think the 6900 (RDNA 2) was supported at one point as well, and in both cases other cards with the same architecture could usually be made to work as well.

Do you assume that it working means official support? I had been under the impression that RDNA had unofficial ROCm support.

Re: AMD RDNA 4 – AMD Radeon RX 9000 Series Graphics Cards

#75
post #63
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nvidia has long been ahead of AMD. They seem to be close to parity right now thanks to Valve’s efforts, but that has historically not been the case. AMD was the one that needed a decade to catch up until Valve started helping. I wonder if the Radeon driver has gotten reliable GPU restart support. The GPU becoming unrecoverable if a shader crashed was long a major issue on Radeon on Linux, and I am not sure if valve f…

On Windows Nvidia has better drivers. On Linux, AMD is far ahead.

Implying Windows Nvidia > Linux Nvidia?

Re: AMD RDNA 4 – AMD Radeon RX 9000 Series Graphics Cards

#76

No ROCm at launch? After they delayed it for months? What a joke. That's like not having CUDA available at launch. https://www.phoronix.com/news/AMD-ROCm-RX-9070-Launch-Day

The ROCm libraries were built for RDNA 4 starting in ROCm 6.3 (the current ROCm release). I'm not sure whether that means it will be considered officially supported in ROCm 6.3 or if it's just experimental in that release.

Re: AMD RDNA 4 – AMD Radeon RX 9000 Series Graphics Cards

#77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s a $600 card with 16GB of RAM. That’s a good deal.

It does seem like there is room for an $700-800 9070AI with 32 gb vram.

There's room but neither GPU vendor is willing to sell 32gb at that price

Re: AMD RDNA 4 – AMD Radeon RX 9000 Series Graphics Cards

#78

Is modern Radeon support on Linux still great? I've heard that NV Geforce on Linux was kinda bad since ever, but it has massively improved over the past 3-4 years. Is Radeon still the way to go for Linux? EDIT: My usecase is a Linux gaming PC. I was fortunate enough to score an RX 6800 during the pandemic, but moved from Windows 10 to Linux a month ago. Everything seems solid, but I'm looking to upgrade the whole PC…

I helped a friend install Linux last year; they had an NVIDIA card, aaaand they had problems. Both in X and Wayland. I'm was on a 6000 series at the time and it worked great, as you know. I am on a 7000 series now, and it's as smooth as ice. AMD is the way to go for Linux.

There's that new NVIDIA driver cooking, but I'm not sure what the status is on it.

BTW, even Ryzen 3 is a substantial upgrade over 1. Any X3D processor (I think 5 is when they first appeared) is even more so. Ryzen 5 is also less sensitive to RAM timings. I applaud you for avoiding latest-and-greatest syndrome, but even upgrading to an older CPU generation would be a significant boost.

Re: AMD RDNA 4 – AMD Radeon RX 9000 Series Graphics Cards

#79
post #61

No ROCm at launch? After they delayed it for months? What a joke. That's like not having CUDA available at launch. https://www.phoronix.com/news/AMD-ROCm-RX-9070-Launch-Day

I am not surprised, ROCm focuses on CDNA. Was RDNA in ROCm ever officially supported?

[deleted]

Re: AMD RDNA 4 – AMD Radeon RX 9000 Series Graphics Cards

#80
post #78

Is modern Radeon support on Linux still great? I've heard that NV Geforce on Linux was kinda bad since ever, but it has massively improved over the past 3-4 years. Is Radeon still the way to go for Linux? EDIT: My usecase is a Linux gaming PC. I was fortunate enough to score an RX 6800 during the pandemic, but moved from Windows 10 to Linux a month ago. Everything seems solid, but I'm looking to upgrade the whole PC…

I helped a friend install Linux last year; they had an NVIDIA card, aaaand they had problems. Both in X and Wayland. I'm was on a 6000 series at the time and it worked great, as you know. I am on a 7000 series now, and it's as smooth as ice. AMD is the way to go for Linux. There's that new NVIDIA driver cooking, but I'm not sure what the status is on it. BTW, even Ryzen 3 is a substantial upgrade over 1. Any X3D proc…

To be fair, I have an nvidia card, I had problems a year ago, but it's gotten a lot better in the past year.
Post reply on HN