Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Would you care to share some examples of the Rust for Linux community who have said this? I'm unaware of Hector or anyone else saying anything similar? In fact, he said that as his very first reply to that thread: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2b9b75d1-eb8e-494a-b05f-59f75c9... >Everything else is distractions orchestrated by a subset of saboteur maintainers who are trying to demoralize you until you give up, because…
> In fact, he said that as his very first reply to that thread: I think it's clear from the surrounding context that you are likely over-interpreting some of Hector's comments. What is the losing side of history here? There is simply too much C code in the Linux project to say "stop this ride, I want to get off and only use Rust" right now. This is a fight about some new code . Rust drivers in kernel and perhaps in t…
The thread was not about Rust drivers, it was about adding Rust code to the DMA module. I.e. about mixing two different languages in a single module, thus requiring being knowledgeable about both languages in order to maintain it, thus making the module less maintainable. In fact, a few developers were saying that they didn't mind Rust drivers, if they used the C ABI as-is. Someone wanted to expose new Rust-specific interfaces to support cleaner abstractions from Rust drivers.