Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think this depends on the context. I would argue that opinionated frameworks are *more* reliable, with the caveat that you need to know, and agree with those opinions. I think of RoR, Laravel, Next.js, and Django etc. like I'm crowdsourcing my apps architecture so I can just worry about building out my business logic. Even if you don't choose a framework at some point you end up building your own framework and intr…
For context, I've been in mobile for 10 years and in general it's the opposite - frameworks are rigid, but the layer under it shifts a lot. These frameworks tend to collapse in an earthquake like manner after multiple updates. We usually support iOS up to 2-3 years old, that's how bad it is. The other approach is to build it on a platform that shifts with the changes, i.e. hybrid and web. But if you crack open the so…
Re: Ask HN: Would you still choose Ruby on Rails for a startup in 2025?
#171Unlike mobile, you have control over the underlying OS and full stack. So usually you aren’t forced to keep pace with your frameworks changes even if they were breaking. So long as you watch and patch security issues you’re fine, it will work forever. But you’ll occasionally likely feel a desire to upgrade things, I find it’s usually out of Want versus Need because it’s already so mature you have time to watch big new versions mature a bit before you roll to it. You might skip a major version or two because of this. Even since very early on I think I had a v1.x app that I continued hacking and building on until eventually moving to v4.x which was maybe 10 years later