Earlier quoted context omitted.
>Innovation would suffer, but 80 million is sufficient for a diversified modern economy. This is laughably naive. Not only would "innovation suffer", but it's pretty doubtful that current technology could be maintained with a population as small as that. Humans are a (weak) hivemind intelligence, and everything we have now is only capable with a population as high as we have it currently. Sure, there might be some in…
I never said hundreds of percent, that's all your imagination. If I were to guess, I would ballpark 25% more efficiency if population were 1% and no growth. I think we are well into the linear and decreasing scale for most industries. How many parallel factories do you think there are around the world building tractors. How many independent factories making cars and trucks? Also, consider how much labor is spent on R…
When they start falling apart, it all starts falling apart. We got a dry run of this in covid with chips. One small part of chip making, think some substrate, was in short supply, and shut down the automakers
And even the Hurricane that hit NC, took out one of the single factories making high end quartz for chips.