[flagged]
[flagged]
AI systems with 'unacceptable risk' are now banned in the EU
21–30 of 424 posts
Re: AI systems with 'unacceptable risk' are now banned in the EU
#22Does this affect open weights AI releases? Or is the ban only on the actual use for the listed cases? Because you can use open weights Mistral models to implement probably everything on that list.
Re: AI systems with 'unacceptable risk' are now banned in the EU
#23Re: AI systems with 'unacceptable risk' are now banned in the EU
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
> AI that tries to infer people’s emotions at work or school. When I talk to ChatGPT advanced voice mode with a happy and upbeat tone, it replies similarly. If I talk to it in a lot neutral way it does adapt. The AI thus infers my emotions. I use ChatGPT at work, my company pays for it. Sounds like I should sue. Also, I am trying to implement a new policy for pull request in my tech team. We send an anonymous form to…
from the actual act, which is linked in the article > the placing on the market, the putting into service for this specific purpose , or the use of AI systems to infer emotions of a natural person in the areas of workplace and education institutions emphasis mine. chatgpt was not specifically put into service to monitor your emotions at work. so it’s fine i’d say. and your pull request thing is fine. also, you’re not…
And its kind of funny when non-legal experts attempt to say something is fine or not.
It depends highly on not only how its written but the spirit of what the EU is attempting to do. The knee jerk reaction is probably that historically institutions do a terrible job of writing rules and especially rules around new technology.
Re: AI systems with 'unacceptable risk' are now banned in the EU
#25> AI that attempts to predict people committing crimes based on their appearance. FTFY: AI that attempts to predict people committing crimes. By "appearance" are they talking about a guy wearing a hoodie must be a hacker or are we talking about race/colour/religious garb etc? I'd rather they just didn't use it for any kind of criminal application at all if I have a say in it! Just my $0.02
> I'd rather they just didn't use it for any kind of criminal application at all if I have a say in it!
Instead of relying on Techcrunch and speculating, you could read sections (33), (42), and (59) of the EU AI Act yourself.
Re: AI systems with 'unacceptable risk' are now banned in the EU
#26link to the actual act: https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/article/5/
link to the q&a: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/qanda_...
(both linked in the article)
Re: AI systems with 'unacceptable risk' are now banned in the EU
#27> AI that attempts to predict people committing crimes based on their appearance. Should have been > AI that attempts to predict people committing crimes
Instead of relying on Techcrunch and speculating, you could read sections (33), (42), and (59) of the EU AI Act yourself.
Re: AI systems with 'unacceptable risk' are now banned in the EU
#28What I don't see here is how the EU is actually defining what is and is not considered AI. > AI that manipulates a person’s decisions subliminally or deceptively. That can be a hugely broad category that covers any algorithmic feed or advertising platform. Or is this limited specifically to LLMs, as OpenAI has so successfully convinced us that LLMs really are Aai and previous ML tools weren't?
the actual text in the ~act~ guidance states: > Exploitation of vulnerabilities of persons, manipulation and use of subliminal techniques techcrunch simplified it. from my reading, it counts if you are intentionally setting out to build a system to manipulate or deceive people . edit — here’s the actual text from the act, which makes more clear it’s about whether the deception is purposefully intended for malicious r…
Seems like even a rudimentary ML model powering ad placements would run afoul of this.
Re: AI systems with 'unacceptable risk' are now banned in the EU
#29What I don't see here is how the EU is actually defining what is and is not considered AI. > AI that manipulates a person’s decisions subliminally or deceptively. That can be a hugely broad category that covers any algorithmic feed or advertising platform. Or is this limited specifically to LLMs, as OpenAI has so successfully convinced us that LLMs really are Aai and previous ML tools weren't?
> What I don't see here is how the EU is actually defining what is and is not considered AI. Because instead of reading the source, you're reading a sensationalist article. > That can be a hugely broad category that covers any algorithmic feed or advertising platform. Again, read the EU AI Act. It's not like it's hidden, or hasn't been available for several years already. ---- We're going to get a repeat of GDPR aren…
Maybe if the GDPR was a simple law instead of 11 chapters and 99 sections and all anyone got as a benefit from it is cookie banners it would be different.
Re: AI systems with 'unacceptable risk' are now banned in the EU
#30[flagged]
That's petty much what's going to happen in the US isn't it ? We'll be able to compare very soon