Nothing to see here. Just a massive conflict of interest from an unelected foreigner exacting power over your government.
[flagged]
Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "
91–100 of 249 posts
Re: Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "
#92The specific law that Trump is very obviously breaking is the Securing Inspector General Independence Act of 2022, which says Congress must be notified 30 days in advance and given "substantive" rationale for dismissing inspectors general. This law was passed specifically in response to Trump breaking the antecedent law, Inspector General Reform Act of 2008, during his first term. Will the "party of law and order" do…
Re: Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "
#93Our government is literally falling in a matter of weeks. It's being assaulted, and we're all just standing by.
Re: Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
The people spoke very clearly in November: they wanted this.
This is my big struggle with all of this. His first term I felt America was duped by a con man so protested and made a fuss on social media. Americans saw the first four years and astonishingly decided they wanted more of it, by a decent margin. So while I absolutely hate what is going on right now this seems to be what the people wanted. I question each day whether that needs to be respected or we should resist. I a…
Re: Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "
#95Are there any good blogs that are chronicling the USA Federal gov's slow descent into facism and overt corruption, just collecting and archiving pieces like this with a classiciation/categorization etc.? I think it's an unprecedented opportunity to record the history of a downfall using modern tools, and future generations might benefit enormously. When I learned about the disruption of the Weimar Republic in highsch…
I think trying to bar such a system simply would make the same things covert.
Re: Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "
#96Nice truncating the title and removing context. If you got fired from literally any private sector company and refused to leave your office, security would escort you out immediately.
Re: Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "
#97Are there any good blogs that are chronicling the USA Federal gov's slow descent into facism and overt corruption, just collecting and archiving pieces like this with a classiciation/categorization etc.? I think it's an unprecedented opportunity to record the history of a downfall using modern tools, and future generations might benefit enormously. When I learned about the disruption of the Weimar Republic in highsch…
Re: Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "
#98Are there any good blogs that are chronicling the USA Federal gov's slow descent into facism and overt corruption, just collecting and archiving pieces like this with a classiciation/categorization etc.? I think it's an unprecedented opportunity to record the history of a downfall using modern tools, and future generations might benefit enormously. When I learned about the disruption of the Weimar Republic in highsch…
There's lots of them, but I respectfully submit that doing something about it in the present - whatever you determine that to be, given your skills and inclinations - is a far higher priority than the educational byproduct for future generations. Using your Weimar example, I would not argue that Germany or humanity is/are better off for having gone through the cataclysm of WW2. In terms of building context, you might…
I also think this is a good summary for those who had never heard of Weimar before: https://archive.is/xh2Ci
But like most summaries, it suffers a bit from focusing on the key events, and not capturing this sort of ... change in the ambient noise floor, and what relationship the average citizen had to what was going on, and what perception of events. I think it's the "Would you have been able to tell that it'd get this bad?" is kind of the more interesting part. A political weather forecasting model, if you will.
Re: Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is my big struggle with all of this. His first term I felt America was duped by a con man so protested and made a fuss on social media. Americans saw the first four years and astonishingly decided they wanted more of it, by a decent margin. So while I absolutely hate what is going on right now this seems to be what the people wanted. I question each day whether that needs to be respected or we should resist. I a…
[flagged]
Re: Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
A minority spoke clearly. Many of "the people" didn't vote, and Trump got less than 50% of those that did.
The ones that didn’t vote are ok with what the voters choose, otherwise they would’ve voted