Live data from Hacker News

Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "

timesofindia.indiatimes.com

91–100 of 249 posts

Re: Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "

#91

Nothing to see here. Just a massive conflict of interest from an unelected foreigner exacting power over your government.

[flagged]

They are either hired following civil service rules, are federal contractors with formal government contracts, or - in rare instances — are vetted and approved by the senate. Musk and his gang of thugs are not federal employees and should not have this level of access.

Re: Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "

#92

The specific law that Trump is very obviously breaking is the Securing Inspector General Independence Act of 2022, which says Congress must be notified 30 days in advance and given "substantive" rationale for dismissing inspectors general. This law was passed specifically in response to Trump breaking the antecedent law, Inspector General Reform Act of 2008, during his first term. Will the "party of law and order" do…

[flagged]

Re: Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "

#93
post #6

Our government is literally falling in a matter of weeks. It's being assaulted, and we're all just standing by.

One thing you can do is shun employees of associated companies (Amazon, Tesla, Facebook) and refuse to give them a job. That requires some sacrifice though.

Re: Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "

#94
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The people spoke very clearly in November: they wanted this.

This is my big struggle with all of this. His first term I felt America was duped by a con man so protested and made a fuss on social media. Americans saw the first four years and astonishingly decided they wanted more of it, by a decent margin. So while I absolutely hate what is going on right now this seems to be what the people wanted. I question each day whether that needs to be respected or we should resist. I a…

No, you don't need to respect it for the same reason we needn't respect the decision-making of suicide cults.

Re: Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "

#95
post #72

Are there any good blogs that are chronicling the USA Federal gov's slow descent into facism and overt corruption, just collecting and archiving pieces like this with a classiciation/categorization etc.? I think it's an unprecedented opportunity to record the history of a downfall using modern tools, and future generations might benefit enormously. When I learned about the disruption of the Weimar Republic in highsch…

On the contrary, there used to be "the spoils system." I'm just a sideline listener but I think that's an appropriate lens to look at this through rather than some severe negative, or dangerously harmful trend.

I think trying to bar such a system simply would make the same things covert.

Re: Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "

#97
post #72

Are there any good blogs that are chronicling the USA Federal gov's slow descent into facism and overt corruption, just collecting and archiving pieces like this with a classiciation/categorization etc.? I think it's an unprecedented opportunity to record the history of a downfall using modern tools, and future generations might benefit enormously. When I learned about the disruption of the Weimar Republic in highsch…

slow?

Re: Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "

#98
post #72

Are there any good blogs that are chronicling the USA Federal gov's slow descent into facism and overt corruption, just collecting and archiving pieces like this with a classiciation/categorization etc.? I think it's an unprecedented opportunity to record the history of a downfall using modern tools, and future generations might benefit enormously. When I learned about the disruption of the Weimar Republic in highsch…

There's lots of them, but I respectfully submit that doing something about it in the present - whatever you determine that to be, given your skills and inclinations - is a far higher priority than the educational byproduct for future generations. Using your Weimar example, I would not argue that Germany or humanity is/are better off for having gone through the cataclysm of WW2. In terms of building context, you might…

Thanks!

I also think this is a good summary for those who had never heard of Weimar before: https://archive.is/xh2Ci

But like most summaries, it suffers a bit from focusing on the key events, and not capturing this sort of ... change in the ambient noise floor, and what relationship the average citizen had to what was going on, and what perception of events. I think it's the "Would you have been able to tell that it'd get this bad?" is kind of the more interesting part. A political weather forecasting model, if you will.

Re: Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "

#99
post #90
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is my big struggle with all of this. His first term I felt America was duped by a con man so protested and made a fuss on social media. Americans saw the first four years and astonishingly decided they wanted more of it, by a decent margin. So while I absolutely hate what is going on right now this seems to be what the people wanted. I question each day whether that needs to be respected or we should resist. I a…

[flagged]

What is wrong with being reappointed to the same job for 22 years? What if she's just...competent? Your argument seems to be that anyone having the same job for that long must be corrupt in some way, but you don't provide anything to support that premise. Ironically, you're implicitly endorsing the resort to illegal means for her removal, rather than following the process defined in law.

Re: Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed "

#100
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A minority spoke clearly. Many of "the people" didn't vote, and Trump got less than 50% of those that did.

The ones that didn’t vote are ok with what the voters choose, otherwise they would’ve voted

They're okay the way a patient in a coma is okay with whatever the doctor does.
Post reply on HN