I’ve been incredibly pleased with DeepSeek this past week. Wonderful product, I love seeing its brain when it’s thinking.
OpenAI O3-Mini
31–40 of 944 posts
Re: OpenAI O3-Mini
#32So far, it seems like this is the hierarchy o1 > GPT-4o > o3-mini > o1-mini > GPT-4o-mini o3 mini system card: https://cdn.openai.com/o3-mini-system-card.pdf
If this is the hierarchy, why does 4o score so much higher than o1 on LLM Arena? Worrisome for OpenAI that Gemini's mini/flash reasoning model outscores both o1 and 4o handily.
Re: OpenAI O3-Mini
#33Pricing for o3-mini [1] is $1.10 / $4.40 per 1M tokens.
[1]: https://platform.openai.com/docs/pricing#:~:text=o3%2Dmini
Re: OpenAI O3-Mini
#34So far, it seems like this is the hierarchy o1 > GPT-4o > o3-mini > o1-mini > GPT-4o-mini o3 mini system card: https://cdn.openai.com/o3-mini-system-card.pdf
Re: OpenAI O3-Mini
#35why should anyone use this when deepseek is free/cheaper? openai is no longer relevant.
But DeepSeek clearly states in their terms of service that they can train on your API data or use it for other purposes. Which one might assume their government can access as well.
We need direct eval comparisons between o3-mini and DeepSeek.. Or, well they are numbers so we can look them up on leaderboards.
Re: OpenAI O3-Mini
#36So far, it seems like this is the hierarchy o1 > GPT-4o > o3-mini > o1-mini > GPT-4o-mini o3 mini system card: https://cdn.openai.com/o3-mini-system-card.pdf
I think OpenAI really needs to rethink its product naming, especially now that they have a portfolio where there's no such clear hierarchy, but they have a place along different axis (speed, cost, reasoning, capabilities, etc). Your summary attempt e.g. also misses o3-mini vs o3-mini-high. Lots of trade-ofs.
I think they could've borrowed a page out of Apple's book, even mountain names would be better. Plus Sonoma, Ventura, and Yosemite are cool names.
Re: OpenAI O3-Mini
#37So far, it seems like this is the hierarchy o1 > GPT-4o > o3-mini > o1-mini > GPT-4o-mini o3 mini system card: https://cdn.openai.com/o3-mini-system-card.pdf
I think OpenAI really needs to rethink its product naming, especially now that they have a portfolio where there's no such clear hierarchy, but they have a place along different axis (speed, cost, reasoning, capabilities, etc). Your summary attempt e.g. also misses o3-mini vs o3-mini-high. Lots of trade-ofs.
Re: OpenAI O3-Mini
#38It uses GPT-4o mini to extract updates from the website using scrapegraphai so this is kinda meta :). Maybe I'll switch to o3 mini depending on cost. It's reasoning abilities, with a lower cost than o1, could be quite powerful for web scraping.
Re: OpenAI O3-Mini
#39I feel like this naming scheme is growing a little tired. o1 is for general knowledge reasoning, o3-mini replaces o1-mini but might be more specialized than o1 for certain technical domains...the "o" in "4o" is for "omni" (referring to its multimodality) but the reasoning models start with "o" ...but they can't use "o2" for trademark reasons so they skip straight to "o3" ...the word salad is getting really hard to follow!
Re: OpenAI O3-Mini
#40Wow, it got to the top of the front page so fast! Weird!