61–70 of 246 posts
Is this what the Web was like in the beginning? Something exciting and fascinating every week?
very far from exciting or even "right"
Is this what the Web was like in the beginning? Something exciting and fascinating every week?
maybe it's a generational difference ? I personally feel burned out by all the generetive AI stuff, the internet was already ruined with bots, and now generitive AI took the garbage to the next level. very far from exciting or even "right"
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the only one I trust any more than I trust Deepseek is Anthropic Will you kindly explain why? Thank you.
Anthropic was the only company in that list not to have paid for their CEO or founder to attend the inaugeration of the current ruler of the exectuive branch of the US a week ago.
Exciting to see this being reproduced, loving the hyper-fast movement in open source! This is exactly why it is not “US vs China”, the battle is between heavily-capitalized Silicon Valley companies versus open source. Every believer in this tech owes DeepSeek some gratitude, but even they stand on shoulders of giants in the form of everyone else who pushed the frontier forward and chose to publish, rather than exploi…
> This is exactly why it is not “US vs China”, the battle is between heavily-capitalized Silicon Valley companies versus open source. Ah yes the "open source" code that was not released by the DeepSeek team and the tens of thousands of professional grade GPUs that were contributed by the "community". DeepSeek is based on Llama which was produced by ... Meta.
Meta never released a mixture of expert model (they failed to train a good one, according to reliable rumors). And MoE is just one of few ingredients that make DeepSeek v3/R1 interesting and good.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
deepseek claims they are "open source" but they are not. They are open weight. IMO a truly "open" AI model should have 3 components publicly available: the weights, the code, and the dataset. Without all 3 the model is not reproducible. Could make the argument that the code and data are sufficient though.
This nitpicking is pointless. DeepSeek's gifts to the world of its open weights, public research and OSS code of its SOTA models are all any reasonable person should expect given no organization is going to release their dataset and open themselves up to criticism and legal exposure. You shouldn't expect to any to see datasets behind any SOTA models until they're able to be synthetically generated from larger models.…
What a strange thing to say…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
the timescales were larger
Much larger. Static HTML AJAX WebSocket, for example weren't it decades in between?
e.g. refreshing borderless iFrames to load new HTML and using hidden iFrames to load new state.
AJAX made it much easier but it didn't offer anything that hadn't been done before.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
And likely massaged by the CCP.
Deep mind has one set of censorship, OpenAI another, anything musk does a third It’s all “massaged”
What a weird thing to equate, though!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
All this AI work is definitely driven by money but it's super cool either way. I'm so excited to be living through these innovations.
Money is in a lot of cases driven by need - so no conflicts