Destined To Fail
11–20 of 110 posts
Re: Destined To Fail
#12I'm concerned that this article contains enough information for TimeWarner to identify Bill. I hope that he doesn't face any retribution.
Re: Destined To Fail
#13I'm concerned that this article contains enough information for TimeWarner to identify Bill. I hope that he doesn't face any retribution.
Really? Reading your comment I realized that I just naturally I assumed Bill wasn't his real name.
Re: Destined To Fail
#14I think of that stupid question, "Debit or Credit?"
The more I think about it, the more I see it as a hypnotic induction that prepares everybody for bad service. It's the perfect thing to get people used to the idea that they shouldn't experience customer delight, never.
Re: Destined To Fail
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
Really? Reading your comment I realized that I just naturally I assumed Bill wasn't his real name.
Doesn't have to be his real name; how many employees were scheduled sometime during the last 2 months to have appointments at 9 at a building called 'Milago'?
Re: Destined To Fail
#16But he and time Warner didn't fail. He sucessfully installed your whatever and TW is getting your money.
Re: Destined To Fail
#17Yeah. I think of that stupid question, "Debit or Credit?" The more I think about it, the more I see it as a hypnotic induction that prepares everybody for bad service. It's the perfect thing to get people used to the idea that they shouldn't experience customer delight, never.
Re: Destined To Fail
#18Re: Destined To Fail
#19Yeah. I think of that stupid question, "Debit or Credit?" The more I think about it, the more I see it as a hypnotic induction that prepares everybody for bad service. It's the perfect thing to get people used to the idea that they shouldn't experience customer delight, never.
How is "debit or credit?" a hypnotic induction that prepares everybody for bad service? Isn't it just a request for a basic bit of information that a cashier needs to process a transaction?
Re: Destined To Fail
#20I guess the "appropriate checkbox" was greyed out (no way I believe people are looking at the html in case there would be an hidden checkbox), then the author used firebug or something to make it visible and then submitted the form hoping the server on the other side is going to do something with the $post variable. Not that tricky but there is no way to confirm it's going to work as intended. IANAL but I raise doubts about the legal validity of such tamperings with web forms.