I'm not asking about your examples, I'm asking about your principles. You say trans people shouldn't go into certain bathrooms, so here we are critically examining your position.
Participation in public life is a key aspect of human society. Going to the bathroom is also a key part of being a human biological being. In recognition of this, the government mandates appropriate bathroom facilities in public places like stores, restaurants, government buildings, etc.
What you're proposing essentially is that a certain class of people should not have access to the bathrooms, and therefore should be excluded from society. Explain how that is not dehumanizing. Do you know how many people kill themselves each year because of policy you are proposing? What if it was your kid?
You're denying them an aspect of society that I am 100% sure you would cry about were similar discrimination applied to you. That you don't feel it to be dehumanizing simply tells me you have not been the target of the kind of discrimination you advocate against others.
And the fact that you don't propose solutions like the government should mandate unisex bathrooms so everyone can go tells me you don't actually want these people in public life, you'd prefer if they all just stayed home. You can't even state that you don't want that.
> I'll also note that it is telling
And what exactly does that tell you? I chose that person from Google image search because he looks like the kind of person conservatives would freak out about for being in the women's restroom. His background is immaterial, no one would know anything about him if they saw him in the woman's room.
> Straw man, and also, false. [1] It is obvious that no delusional person has the right to reorder society's customs, culture, and laws. Or are you arguing that we must take all delusional people seriously in order to placate trans-people?
No, I'm pointing out our society is already run by disordered individuals. You're acting like trans people are so uniquely crazy they don't deserve to be taken seriously. But people who believe in an invisible sky wizard who speaks to them in their dreams and who grants their wishes are running the government and setting national policy based on a book of fiction they think is real. Talk about delusion, but you're fine with that, yeah?
George Bush absolutely talked about God all the time and how God influenced his decisions. The fact that in his argument for war he lied about the motivation when the whole time he was hearing voices in his head that implored him to go to war is a problem. But conservatives are fine listening to voices in their heads and setting policy over it.
I'll leave with this final point: every time a conservative says to a person "You're not man enough" or "man up", they are admitting that gender is a spectrum and implicitly linked with societal gender roles. If gender is binary then one is either man, or a woman. There's no way to become "more" of a man if gender is binary. Unless of course gender is a spectrum and a construct of society, and not biologically immutable. So is it really a delusion if even conservatives implicitly believe it?