Live data from Hacker News

I Switched to Firefox and Never Looked Back

howtogeek.com

461–470 of 536 posts

Re: I Switched to Firefox and Never Looked Back

#461
post #453

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

> If your internet server serves content, I'm entitled to connect to it. Nope

As far as I can tell, this case went nowhere:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_Department_of_Element...

I'm curious if you know of any court cases that back up your position. I've connected to a lot of servers today and downloaded all the information they sent me.

Re: I Switched to Firefox and Never Looked Back

#462

Earlier quoted context omitted.

rei.com generally continues to have issues with firefox. Completely absurd.

What issues specifically? I'm a long time REI customer and a long time (since it was called Firebird) Firefox user, and I've never encountered any issues.

It may be interactions with ublock origin. On Chrome, I only have adblock plus. However, disabling UBO on Firefox does not fix the problems. The most obvious one right now: blank page after login.

Re: I Switched to Firefox and Never Looked Back

#463

Firefox on Android is a no-brainer because of the extension support. It was a bit rough experience few years ago but has been solid for a long time.

Kiwi Browser for me on Android with full extensions support and developer tools. Any reason to switch to Firefox on Android?

Re: I Switched to Firefox and Never Looked Back

#464
post #164
post #138

I've used Firefox on desktop since 2019. It's upsetting how often (it's not every day, but more often than it should) a website just doesn't work because of the devs didn't test on Firefox at all. I even ran into this on Vanguard, a firm that manages god knows how much in assets, on a page to download PDFs... I used to get teased (all in good fun) at my last company for being the only dev that used Firefox. Then I'd…

Strange, been using it since inception, but since 2019 I can probably could on one hand the times I couldn't use firefox and had to crack open chrome/safari/whatever. It's usally been overly zealous ublock rules that have stopped me, but easily fixed and nothing to do with firefox.

Question for all you people who have used Firefox before 2022: how did you deal with its poor spell checking?

I used it for a few years, but sometime around the end of 2021 I switched to Chrome because I got tired of the Firefox spell checker marking correctly spelled words as incorrectly spelled.

Here's a list of words I reported in 2020 and 2021 on the open issue they keep in their bug tracker for this problem:

ad hominem, algorithmically, all-nighter, another's, auditable, automata, backlight, ballistically, blacksmithing, bubonic, cantina, chewable, coaxially, commenter, conferenced, counterintuitive, dominator, epicycle, ethicist, exonerations, ferrite, fineable, hatchling, impaction, implementer, implementor, inductor, initializer, intercellular, irrevocability, licensor, lifecycle, manticore, massless, measurer, meerkats, micropayments, mischaracterization, misclassification, misclassified, mistyped, mosquitos, partygoers, passthrough, per se, phosphine, plough, pre-programmed, preprogrammed, programmability, prosecutable, recertification, responder, retransmission, rotator, seatbelt, sensationalistic, shapeshifting, solvability, spectrogram, splitter, subparagraphs, subtractive, surveil, survivorship, synchronizer, tradable, tradeoffs, transactional, trichotomy, tunable, underspecified, untraceably, untyped, verifiability, verifier, webmail

It was kind of puzzling because Firefox actually uses the same open source spell check engine that Google, Apple, LibreOffice, and many others use, and all those others had no trouble with any of the words that Firefox got wrong. This suggests that it might just be a dictionary problem and Firefox could simply grab the dictionary that say LibreOffice uses.

I mentioned that on one of my comments in the bug tracker and a developer said they were going to look into it but I don't know if anything ever came from that. All the words I reported now work but I don't know if they just added those to their dictionary or switched to a better dictionary.

Maybe I'll try doing my HN commenting from Firefox for a while and see if is fixed.

Re: I Switched to Firefox and Never Looked Back

#465

Problem for Android users like me is Chrome is the default on mobile, so all passwords bookmarks etc are there. Of course we can install Firefox but I find Chrome better on mobile. Just couldn't get used to FF on Android. Moving to laptop it then makes sense to continue using it instead of installing Firefox over and above Edge anyway there plus Chrome. So it gets crowded out.

Agreed Chrome is good on mobile. But I can't stand browsing without uBlockOrigin or dark reader. Plus URL bar on the bottom in Firefox is brilliant.

Lol that was the hard part getting used to...thanks for suggestions I will try with uBlockOrigin.

Re: I Switched to Firefox and Never Looked Back

#466

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Safari has recently added Profiles which are very similar: https://support.apple.com/en-us/105100 OTOH Vivaldi guys said that much as they'd like to implement this, they're unable to due to some architectural issues with Blink. So basically no Blink browser will have that unless and until Google decides to do it in Chrome - which seems unlikely given their incentives.

Chrome supports multiple profiles https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/2364824

If I remember correctly, these are profiles in the same sense this term is used in Firefox - i.e. a global setting that can be switched, but applies to all active browser windows at the time. So you can't use it to (easily) browse different websites in different profiles side by side.

In Safari, "profiles" are a per-window thing, and there are facilities to open a website in a different profile etc, so effectively they work much more like Firefox containers (which are even more fine-grained tho: per-tab).

Re: I Switched to Firefox and Never Looked Back

#467

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm pretty sure it won't, given that it hasn't worked so far for much worse stuff (like people implementing the panopticon at Palantir).

It's not possible to shame a group of people who can't even agree on baseline ethical issues around their profession. For every engineer who refuses to work on guided missiles or the Torment Nexus and would feel shame to do so, there's another engineer who would find it an interesting technical problem.

When such things work, it's not because people who do it feel ashamed, it's because the society ostracizes them so much that it becomes actually inconvenient to function in it.

Oh, and it is an interesting problem. In the abstract.

Re: I Switched to Firefox and Never Looked Back

#468

Earlier quoted context omitted.

YouTube is hardly the only website on the Internet. And besides that, YouTube splits ad revenue 40/60 yt/creator anyway. So I suppose those creators are all in on the scheme too?

But the service is free. So I will watch (without ads) until it becomes paid. And then, it depends on whether the value is still there.

So is the coffee at my local "pay what you please" cafe.

Re: I Switched to Firefox and Never Looked Back

#469
I use Pocket, and I love it. However, I would prefer if it wasn’t built into Firefox but instead remained as an extension. One thing that astonishes me is that, even as a built-in feature, every few weeks, when I click "Save," I find that I’ve been logged out. It shows me a login flow, and after completing it, the link isn’t even saved—I have to click "Save" again. That’s frustrating.
Post reply on HN