The English language reporting on this reform proposal is not comprehensive.
Here's an article on it by one of the national papers of record, El País: https://elpais.com/espana/2025-01-13/sanchez-anuncia-una-int...
Some interesting tidbits from the article:
- Some local governments, which are run by a party opposed to the governing national party, oppose the existing laws regarding price regulation and refuse to enforce price caps. This is possible because Spain has a lot of power devolved to local governments. The proposal attempts to side-step local governments by giving property owners a 100% income tax rebate if they abide by national price regulations for their properties. It essentially incentivizes individuals to enforce what regional governments are supposed to be implementing.
- Spain's public housing inventory is low compared to other European counterparts - Spain's at 2.5%, France at 14%, Netherlands at 34%.
- There are some comparisons to the construction rates during the 2000s housing bubble and how the inventory has shifted between single and multi family dwellings.
- The measures include plans to promote prefabricated/modular housing as it is much cheaper to produce at scale.
Sidestepping uncooperative local governments is an interesting technique given their devolved system of government. I would also be curious to see how prefab/modular housing measures develop. If they are combining some old school "price cap / limit foreign investment" strategy with a pro manufactured housing YIMBYism, that would be kind of unique.
From my quick scan of the article, the 100% tax on non-EU residents isn't even reported on. The reform is much more comprehensive and, in my mind, likely to get passed in some form even if the 100% tax gets cut from the final bill.
There are also some less than factual opinion statements like this dropped in the Guardian's article:
> Given his government’s longstanding struggles to pass legislation, one analyst suggested to the Financial Times that the government’s aim was to deter foreign property investors by creating “uncertainty and noise” with a proposal that has slim chances of becoming law.
IMO this is under-selling the current president's political survivability, regardless of what you think of him or his policies. He is currently in power because he convinced a separatist Catalonian party whose leader is exiled from the country to join his coalition.
I'd rather not get into it on HN, but read about his tenure for yourself. The Guardian's article is not a good enough summary of what is being proposed and is not giving thorough enough context.