Live data from Hacker News

3blue1brown YouTube Bitcoin video taken down as copyright violation

twitter.com

431–438 of 438 posts

Re: 3blue1brown YouTube Bitcoin video taken down as copyright violation

#431

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your actions are controlled by their consequences, not cops. You go to work, like everyone else. You are civil to people - because you choose - and keep your job. Your freedom is a false illusion and can be boiled down to statistics, your zip code, age, IQ, etc. Even your advocacy of uncaused agency is, itself, fully caused, reinforced, shaped and controlled . And I never said evolution is exclusively a reference to…

All of that is so wildly off base and off-topic from the argument at hand: People can do what they want unless you or someone else physically stops them. > I can police English if I am as free as you say I am. You can try. How is that working out for you? Your original comment attempting to police language was flagged and died, looks to me like you were politely shown the door.

People gaming the comment system concerns me not at all.

Flag away.

The comment police are stopping me from "doing what I want"?

Gosh.

Re: 3blue1brown YouTube Bitcoin video taken down as copyright violation

#432

Earlier quoted context omitted.

All of that is so wildly off base and off-topic from the argument at hand: People can do what they want unless you or someone else physically stops them. > I can police English if I am as free as you say I am. You can try. How is that working out for you? Your original comment attempting to police language was flagged and died, looks to me like you were politely shown the door.

People gaming the comment system concerns me not at all. Flag away. The comment police are stopping me from "doing what I want"? Gosh.

It's not being gamed, the community just doesn't care for what you have to say when it's policing other people. "You can't tell me not to tell people no because then you'd be telling me no" is not a good take. You need to step back and learn from this.

Re: 3blue1brown YouTube Bitcoin video taken down as copyright violation

#433

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm self-employed, and the existence of a top-down hierarchical power structure is not evidence that one is necessary. We're also now several straw mans away from the original argument.

I assert that necessity is self created. The Romans made themselves your boss. There was no "rational" necessity. Bosses come into existence by will, not logic. The world is irrational. Strawman are legitimate forms of persuasive argument, logic is for Spock.

There is nothing legitimate or persuasive about the flawed argument you're presenting.

Re: 3blue1brown YouTube Bitcoin video taken down as copyright violation

#434
post #295

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't mean banning the company which does the takedown submission, I mean the company that actually owns the copyright. That would result in companies being a lot more vary in terms of whom to trust with such job.

So if I make 3 bogus takedown requests based on stairway to heaven's copyright being violated, no one can make copyright strikes based on stairway to heaven?

if you have the rights for the song and it's a bogus claim, yes

Re: 3blue1brown YouTube Bitcoin video taken down as copyright violation

#435

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are quite a few cases, but probably using a different search engine will help with citations: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2019/08/youtubes-new-lawsuit-s... https://torrentfreak.com/youtube-settles-lawsuit-with-allege... https://videogamelaw.allard.ubc.ca/2019/10/18/settlement-bet... Content ID is just as bad... if not worse... given no one checks for fair-use cases. A lot of old public-domain stock-footage wa…

You originally wrote that extortion of funds is an ongoing pervasive issue: > In general, the racketeers will ask for a fee whether they have rights to the IP or not. They play the numbers counting on people not calling their bluff, and googles limited 3 strikes policy on channel publishers. The three links you provided are all about the same, single, extreme case - from seven years ago - that ended with YouTube suin…

Indeed, I gather you don't often talk with very many other content producers.

What made the case exceptional, was the fact they caught the guy and there were legal consequences. Usually, this does not occur... at best it wastes everyone's time, at worse it costs you like any other SLAPP lawsuit.

Best of luck, and check if your commercial insurance covers legal expenses. =3

Note, this is often used for political purposes as well:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/london/anti-vaxx-nurse-libel-...

https://ifex.org/a-dark-year-for-media-in-belarus-and-slapp-...

YT gives zero Fs about anything not making them money =3

Post reply on HN