My favourite colour is Chuck Norris red
31–40 of 112 posts
Re: My favourite colour is Chuck Norris red
#32With the size of modern web pages and the scale. This must amount to a very significant cost.
Re: My favourite colour is Chuck Norris red
#33Considering all the misery inflicted by computer crime that's enabled by the forgiving attitude, I 100% agree. And given the choice between "you can still visit the Space Jam website[0]" or "never worry about drive-by ransomware again", I'm pretty sure I'd be with the majority in choosing the latter. Security is a heavy price to pay for whimsy. Old-technology hobbyists could still run old web browsers in sandboxed VMs.
Re: My favourite colour is Chuck Norris red
#34The concept of graceful degradation in web feature support is dead now. Presently most of the web fails to render at all if you don’t execute a giant javascript blob in full that is responsible for putting the words on the page. It’s quite sad.
Re: My favourite colour is Chuck Norris red
#35The included codepen is unreadable on mobile until you remove -webkit-text-stroke from them CSS. At the initial value of 0.5rem it gives a quite cool effect, as if the text has been badly redacted with a white highlighter. I initially thought that was intentional.
Re: My favourite colour is Chuck Norris red
#36>I've heard people quip that browsers should be less forgiving and enforce perfection. That allowing jank makes the web somehow 'bad'. Considering all the misery inflicted by computer crime that's enabled by the forgiving attitude, I 100% agree. And given the choice between "you can still visit the Space Jam website[0]" or "never worry about drive-by ransomware again", I'm pretty sure I'd be with the majority in choo…
Re: My favourite colour is Chuck Norris red
#37Re: My favourite colour is Chuck Norris red
#38This reminded me of one of my first web-dev projects as a teenager - the first one I showed my (recently passed) father, in which you were prompted to ask "Chuck Norris" a yes or no question with a text box, and then would present you a yes or no answer with a suitable photo of the man himself. I did some rudimentary string parsing on submit, and if the question started with a word like "Where", "How", "Why", "Who" a…
This reminds me of the early web. So many fun websites like this. Now it's just silos controlled by megacorps, trying to outdo each other in competition for attention.
And endless, classic, non-https sites still exist too.
They are just pages deep in Google's search results, especially with the entire first several pages of scrolling being their almost always wrong suggestions.
And it doesn't help that verbatim is completely broken now, and that Google aliases search terms, and drops search terms, even when using quotes.
A horrible design, and the result is all that goodness is harder to find.
It's not siloed, it's Google only
Re: My favourite colour is Chuck Norris red
#39> If an octothorpe (#) is located at the start of the value, it's removed. An “octothorpe”! I never knew it was called that (and, apparently, neither does autocorrect). What a glorious name!
Re: My favourite colour is Chuck Norris red
#40If you really want pedantic strictness and perfection, native applications are the place to work. But it isnt always better.
And the web is fast, like really fast in rendering highly markedup text layouts. Just because everyone uses a frontend framework for “maintainability” doesn’t mean the engine is slow.