Mysterious New Jersey drone sightings prompt call for 'state of emergency'

Post by squeaky-clean » Thu, Dec 12, 2024, 5:30 AM UTC

vasco wrote: post #421

davidw wrote: post #379

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A decent percentage of the population thinks that the president of the US can control the weather. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/government-not-controlling-the-... The fact of the matter is that a lot of people have rotten, worm-riddled cabbage for brains.

Of course the government can control the weather, what are you on about: > In the United States, cloud seeding is used to increase precipitation in areas experiencing drought, to reduce the size of hailstones that form in thunderstorms, and to reduce the amount of fog in and around airports. In the summer of 1948, the usually humid city of Alexandria, Louisiana, under Mayor Carl B. Close, seeded a cloud with dry ice…

Post by nradov » Thu, Dec 12, 2024, 5:40 AM UTC

ksec wrote: post #442

I am not normally for regulation but I think Drones needs to be regulated.

Post by magic_smoke_ee » Thu, Dec 12, 2024, 5:47 AM UTC

apcragg wrote: post #13

The photos I've seen posted look very obviously like commercial airliners and helicopters with their navigation lights on. You can even make out the American Airlines livery on the tail! https://www.app.com/story/news/local/new-jersey/2024/12/11/d...

Post by nixosbestos » Thu, Dec 12, 2024, 5:49 AM UTC

nixosbestos wrote: post #145

guhcampos wrote: post #65

[flagged]

Oh, here, I'll make you feel better. Go check sub of the alien/ufo subreddits. Literally you'll see comments that amount to "my life sucks and is boring, this would be exciting even if bad". It's uh, a bit maddening and a bit sad.

Post by 8note » Thu, Dec 12, 2024, 5:58 AM UTC

keepamovin wrote: post #406

craftsman wrote: post #400

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "are assessed by the Pentagon yesterday to not originate in the US or any other nation" This statement logically means that: * The Pentagon assessed (determined) that X is true * Where X is defined as "The drones do not originate in the US or any other nation" That is different than the statement: * The Pentagon has stated that (a) X is false, and (b) they have no evidence that Y is true. * Where X is defined as "T…

For clarity the exact words the Pentagon staff in the video used are: "at this time we have no evidence that these activities are coming from a foreign entity or the work of an adversary...these are not US military drones" What's your thoughts?