Live data from Hacker News

Starlink Direct to Cell

starlink.com

211–220 of 831 posts

Re: Starlink Direct to Cell

#211

If anyone from Starlink or SpaceX is reading these comments here’s what you want to do: Sell your own branded trail cam with solar charging and LTE from orbit. You can charge $25-$40 a month for unlimited pictures sent from the cam. This would open up hunters, nature enthusiasts, and researchers to be able to place their hardware anywhere in the field without worrying about connectivity. Here in SWVA we have deep hol…

[deleted]

Re: Starlink Direct to Cell

#212
post #38

> ENGINEERED BY SPACEX It would be very interesting to see some kind of diagram depicting all of the corporate entities Musk is involved in and how each entity does business with one another. xAI just raised billions to help Tesla build out FSD (or at least that was part of the pitch). His empire is divided into so many corporate entities, but they all cross-pollinate and are clearly under his direct control for the…

Starlink has always been a SpaceX project.

I don't see what's confusing about it.

Re: Starlink Direct to Cell

#214

[flagged]

Meh lines the pockets of Tim Cook. Hard pass.

If I have to choose, I'd rather line the pockets of the gay man who believes in people's rights and whose only ambition is to get me to buy into his ecosystem of well engineered but overpriced hardware,

instead of the man who just bought himself a President so that he can direct government spending towards his businesses and away from his competitors while disowning his own child for their sexuality, and whose ambition is to rule the planet.

Re: Starlink Direct to Cell

#216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well, it's certainly how Musk likes to market himself.

12 children, 3 billion dollars companies, "advising" the government on cutting millions of jobs", yet he is "very hands on"

don't forget his diablo IV streams

Seriously though, if he's primarily in a delegation mode these days, good for him, I think he's earned it

Bias disclosure: I feel like I could be a Musk if I actually had zero laziness and a few extra connections. We are similar in intelligence and interests and worldview (other than his edgy tweets of the last 1-2 years)

Re: Starlink Direct to Cell

#217

My question is how the laser backhaul works. If the satellites are constantly moving how do they adjust since lasers require line of sight?

The constellation is subdivided into orbital planes, with ~20 to ~60 satellites in each plane chasing each other around the planet. The following is somewhat speculative: The bearing to the next satellite ahead or behind you in the same plane should be roughly constant; likewise, the bearing to satellites in adjacent planes orbiting in the same direction will change slowly during most of the orbit. Near the poles the…

Does the laser pointer have azimuth and elevation as free parameters like ground receiving antennas?

Re: Starlink Direct to Cell

#218
post #203

If anyone from Starlink or SpaceX is reading these comments here’s what you want to do: Sell your own branded trail cam with solar charging and LTE from orbit. You can charge $25-$40 a month for unlimited pictures sent from the cam. This would open up hunters, nature enthusiasts, and researchers to be able to place their hardware anywhere in the field without worrying about connectivity. Here in SWVA we have deep hol…

This could also be a hardware startup. If only there were some entrepreneur types around... Presumably there's a market for this in other niches, e.g. weather monitoring, defense/border monitoring, etc... The question is whether the juice is worth the squeeze. Where's the really valuable data?

I recall not too long ago a startup advertising exactly this idea for farms. It was some box with various sensors (and output lines) that you could configure to do a multitude of tasks

Re: Starlink Direct to Cell

#219
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't have a clue what you're talking about, so from what did you derive these harsh feelings? Starlink satellites are in LEO, without active boosting they decay in mere years.

A decayed satellite doesn't just disappear though. There's particulate pollution from it burning up, not to mention the pollution from rocket launches. There's also the light pollution that the astronomy community has been complaining about for years.

What about the pollution from creating electricity that powers your devices? and manufactures them?

Re: Starlink Direct to Cell

#220
post #171

I love how libertarians are willing to use a communication network controlled by a billionaire oligarch who bought a presidency to further his business and personal ideological interests, but are worried about government overreach.

What's your concern with people choosing to use Starlink?

I'm not concerned that people are choosing to use it. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy of libertarianism.
Post reply on HN