Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think they only need to show intent if they are being charged with genocide, however, I think in this case they are being charged with using starvation as a weapon, hindering aid, and targeting hospitals. I think the recommendation also included extermination, which is similar to genocide, but also does not require intent, but I think the voted against that. I think the evidence for the charges which were actually…
> I think the recommendation also included extermination, which is similar to genocide, but also does not require intent, but I think the voted against that. Persecution is the charge probably most similar to genocide minus a lot of the intent requirements (which was granted). The requirements for extermination (which was rejected) is basically they have to be resposible for > 50 illegal deaths (not sure on the exact…
Did the prosecutor simply fail to put forward good enough evidence to convince the judges?
Not that it matters the most, the charges they did bring are serious enough.