Live data from Hacker News

ICC issues warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas officials

icc-cpi.int

291–300 of 1001 posts

Re: ICC issues warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas officials

#291

I doubt there will be actual arrests, but there will be and there are already consequences. I just saw France and Netherlands announced they will obey the warrants, thus Netanyahu can no longer travel there. Presumably the whole of EU is off limits (I am unaware which countries recognize the court).

EU foreign policy chief said the court's decision should be implemented. Ireland also indicated they would comply with the warrant.

Re: ICC issues warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas officials

#292
post #144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Did they really think that when they talk Hebrew to their audience, rest of the world does not hear them. When it comes to US public opinion, that's normally the way it works.

[flagged]

I don't necessarily think you're wrong, but drawing any conclusions from random people on Twitter seems like a mistake. They might not be human, they might not be Israeli, and they might not be representative of Israel's 9 million people. I wouldn't want anybody to judge me based on how English-speaking Twitter accounts behave.

Re: ICC issues warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas officials

#294
post #279

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Stories about divisive topics are routinely flagged from all sides. It's common, if not inevitable, for people who feel strongly about $topic to conclude that the system (or the community, or the mods, etc.) are biased against their side ( https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que... ). One is far more likely to notice whatever data points that one dislikes because they go against one's view and ov…

Sure, and yet if you take the examples you provided, unless you just happened to make a series of "unlucky" picks the probability is that the bias is pretty strong.

Now of course, there's nothing inherently wrong with having a bias (depending on the bias of course), but if you clearly have one while claiming to try and be unbiased that's wrong imo.

Re: ICC issues warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas officials

#295

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Well until they have proof of his death it stands to reason they should arrest him.

[flagged]

The person was alive when the requests for the warrants were filed.

Re: ICC issues warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas officials

#297
post #94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

1. Israel de facto controls the Rafah border. 2. Due to (1), and clear & consistent messaging by Israeli officials on Gaza resettlement as a goal, Egypt understands that “temporary” refugees will be unable to return - i.e., a repeat of 1948 and 1967.

Both sides are using the border as a bargaining chip. Both sides are complicit.

I find it difficult to ignore the not so distant start to this current situation. Not even a hundred years ago foreigners showed up and said this is our place now. Now after decades of oppression, with both sides unhappy with the you get 5% of the land you used live on deal, the party with 95% of the land proposes a new deal, we get 100% of the land and you get uh .. to live somewhere else.

As a comparison saying "Both native Americans and European settlers are complicit in the violence that occurred between them" is technically correct but hardly paints a representative picture. Personally I don't like the both did violence so both are wrong narrative.

Re: ICC issues warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas officials

#300
post #276

[flagged]

Because nobody is invading Israel. Nobody's declaring war.

The whole point of international law is to hold citizens of sovereign nations accountable, without having to go to war to achieve it.

Nobody has legal authority to go into Israel to seize Netanyahu. But now he knows that if he tries to travel to Europe, he will be seized upon entry. That's not war, that's simply apprehending someone who there is an arrest warrant out for.

Post reply on HN