Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm wondering what power does the ICC have to carry out its sentencing if the US chooses to disagree with it? Same with The Hague court, where the US said its soldiers would be imune from standing trial for crimes. So if these international courts are only allowed selective enforcement, what's the point of their existence? To only prosecute people the US doesn't choose to protect? Then what's the line between good gu…
There are many signatories who are obliged to arrest anyone with an ICC warrant: https://asp.icc-cpi.int/states-parties
ICC issues warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas officials
91–100 of 1001 posts
Re: ICC issues warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas officials
#92Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are many signatories who are obliged to arrest anyone with an ICC warrant: https://asp.icc-cpi.int/states-parties
Obliged by who? The US can choose to wipe their ass with whatever they signed and arbitrarily say NO to a request they don't like. Who's gonna hold them accountable for breaking their signed agreement? Wasn't there the same pitfall with the League of Nations?
Re: ICC issues warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas officials
#93"The Chamber therefore found reasonable grounds to believe that Mr Netanyahu and Mr Gallant bear criminal responsibility for the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare." Whats perhaps interesting to note is that this charge was made for "just" 41 [1] confirmed starvation deaths among a population of 2,141,643 people [2]. Of course every death caused by intentional starvation is a severe crime and must be puni…
IANAL but this is probably incorrect i think - the starvation charge is related to allegations of intentionally restricting neccesities of life. Whether anyone dies as a result is irrelavent to that charge. The murder charge is for the people who actually allegedly died as a result (of the starvation that is. To be clear, the death has to illegal for it to be the war crime of murder. Normal combat death is not murder).
Re: ICC issues warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas officials
#94"The Chamber therefore found reasonable grounds to believe that Mr Netanyahu and Mr Gallant bear criminal responsibility for the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare." Whats perhaps interesting to note is that this charge was made for "just" 41 [1] confirmed starvation deaths among a population of 2,141,643 people [2]. Of course every death caused by intentional starvation is a severe crime and must be puni…
[flagged]
2. Due to (1), and clear & consistent messaging by Israeli officials on Gaza resettlement as a goal, Egypt understands that “temporary” refugees will be unable to return - i.e., a repeat of 1948 and 1967.
Re: ICC issues warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas officials
#95Wow, this took a long time to come after the application for the warrants. 185 days compared to 23 days for Putin's arrest warrant — but then again, one was against the wishes of the USA and the west while the other was at their behest.
Re: ICC issues warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas officials
#96EDIT: Asking genuinely on Gallant all I know is he was minister of defence and had a felling out with Netanyahu.
Re: ICC issues warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas officials
#97Re: ICC issues warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas officials
#98[flagged]
Re: ICC issues warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas officials
#99Re: ICC issues warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant, and Hamas officials
#100When was the last time a head of state was arrested by the ICC?
Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic was arrested and deported by the government of Yugoslavia after him. Of course, under immense pressure from the west. My preference would be that we tried him under our courts and sent him to jail in Yugoslavia/Serbia. Now, imposing "justice" obviously only works when you do it to small nations like Yugoslavia or Rwanda. Of course it will not apply to the Israel leader, let alone…