Live data from Hacker News

The Onion buys Infowars

nytimes.com

701–710 of 1001 posts

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#701
post #162
post #133

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Honest question: what threats did Jones make against them? I understood that he claimed it was a hoax/conspiracy, not that he had made any threats. Not even sure how he could make threats against people he didn't believe were real.

The threats were made by Jones followers rather than Jones personally.

If I understand correctly: if I threaten a third party based on something you’ve said, you now face legal liability?

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#702

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are you suggesting that everything Alex Jones says is supposed to be funny ? And we all just don't get the joke?

Joe Rogan, live, has Jamie research outlandish claims Alex Jones makes, and it turns out there are citations providing the basis for his claims. If you don't get a kick out of that, yes, you don't get it.

So Alex Jones is just doing an immersive comedy bit.

But Alex Jones is also basing his claims on factual citations.

"He's just joking! But he's also telling the truth." Got it.

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#704

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Since Musk's acquisition of Twitter, it has increasingly become a right wing echo chamber and place to promote conspiracy theories. And Alex Jones' InfoWars and Elon Musk's Twitter are both likely to show you advertisements for supplements of dubious effectiveness and other generally scammy products. So yeah, Jones fits right in there.

I take it that left wingers feel that "community notes" isn't effective or sufficient to combat right wing beliefs that are wrong? The people on the right seem satisfied for now that they can "combat misinformation with more information". (That's a misquote by the way, I believe he said better information, not more. On second thought, he may have said it both ways.) Has anyone discussed why the right believes this ca…

Community notes isn’t scalable.

So when you have people like Musk constantly posting by the time a note is added the value of it has long since diminished.

Also your left/right wing argument is entirely something you’ve invented.

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#705

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Was it? The constitution lays out slander and libel as types of speech that can be censored. The trashy Jones then knowingly and maliciously lied about people for profit - aka libel and slander. Seems reasonable to take the money he made as well as punitive damages. How is censorship?

> How is censorship? How does he make future money, you know for living? The judgement basically means the courts get to garnish his wages until the judgement is paid. Jones is a goof to me and I like seeing him rant and rave and wear foil hats. But I don't think anyone should have their livelihood taken from them by censorship of the courts. EDIT: remember all judgments and penalties cut both ways. Today Jones tomor…

> Today Jones tomorrow someone you follow in the media.

Christ. As a non-American, this comment says a lot about the hilariously broken state of your political landscape.

“It could happen to one of your guys, and that somehow makes it bad!”

Anyone that does what Alex did deserves his punishment, and I’d be against anyone that did what he did, even if I previously “followed” them.

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#706
post #652

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, I don’t. Those situations aren’t remotely comparable. I suspect you already know this but are using the Sandy Hook victims as a jumping off point to discuss something unrelated. Please don’t do that.

Then make a full argument, not just implying that "making money from dead school shooting victims" is somehow immoral. Every newspaper does just that! Very low quality comment, not worthy of HN (but of course useful for woke virtue signalling about "how bad is Alex Jones").

Nobody owes you a debate.

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#707

The onion should just keep Alex Jones without any filters but put the onion logo on every page. The joke is already good enough, just keep it going.

Not a good idea, Alex Jones is a big reason for the hate against people like Anthony Fauci.

Anthony Fauci is a big reason for the hate against people like Anthony Fauci.

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#708
post #2

The announcement by America's Finest News Source: https://theonion.com/heres-why-i-decided-to-buy-infowars/ Alex Jones response: https://x.com/RealAlexJones/status/1857058831135645739

Seems like the article is really gleeful. Somewhat ironic since The Onion could be brought down in the same way by defamation lawsuits.

I’m glad that you didn’t waste effort saying “I am not a lawyer” here, because it’s very very apparent that you aren’t.

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#709

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Have any of them been confirmed yet? No. You can't even bring yourself to mention that the Defense nominee has actually served in the Army, and is a decorated veteran. Stop acting like such a partisan; it is far too early to commence the bed-wetting.

So I am qualified to be SecDef, because I am a veteran? That is ridiculous. Of all the reasonable qualifications, that ranks just about dead last.
Post reply on HN