Live data from Hacker News

The Onion buys Infowars

nytimes.com

551–560 of 1001 posts

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#551

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Twitter/X Why not call it one or the other?

Call it Twitter. Everyone knows what you mean, and it annoys Elon.

Call it X. Everyone knows what you mean and it really stirs shit up with people who are emotionally attached to the old brand name.

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#552

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think the Onion is as good as it ever was. The issue now is that the real news is so wild and unhinged the Onion doesn't have that segment cornered anymore.

The Onion youtube vids of the late 2000's were phenomenal. It was all downhill from there imo. Take a look at this recent video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2niC4ACCp20 . I don't like Taylor Swift but this is just not funny. I don't see what the point of it is is. Compare to this celebrity satire of the golden era: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9QisdRPwEM .

The new one is really bad. Feels so fake. And the anchor can't role play. The old one is so much better. If you don't listen, you don't even get that it is a joke.

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#553

The NPR article conveys that this was more than just a very clever stunt > "The Connecticut families agreed to forgo a portion of their recovery to increase the overall value of The Onion's bid, enabling its success," according to their lawyers. ... Jones was hoping a bidder ideologically aligned with him would have bought Infowars and hired him back to keep doing his show. https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/nx-s1-518939…

Yeah, this seems like a clear-cut "We want justice, not money" decision. We don't know how much the families gave up (could be a little, could be significant), but whatever it was was the difference between Infowars remaining what it is or utterly destroying Infowars' credibility. Because now the Wikipedia entry is going to say "parody site" at the top.

> We don't know how much the families gave up (could be a little, could be significant)

It's hard to put yourself in someone else's shoes but as a parent I can imagine the money not playing an important factor at all in this. Money would hopefully be the least of my worries.

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#554
I thought this was a prank, but "The satirical news company plans to shutter Jones’ Infowars and rebuild the website featuring well-known internet humor writers and content creators."

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/onion-wins-alex-jones-i...

See also: "Why I Decided To Buy 'InfoWars'"

"Make no mistake: This is a coup for our company and a well-deserved victory for multinational elites the world over... we plan to collect the entire stock of the InfoWars warehouses into a large vat and boil the contents down into a single candy bar–sized omnivitamin that one executive (I will not name names) may eat in order to increase his power and perhaps become immortal."

https://theonion.com/heres-why-i-decided-to-buy-infowars/

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#556

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Freedom of Speech was never intended to, nor does it, cause more lies or less lies. What it does do, however, is ensure that the Gov't cannot have a monopoly on lies which is precisely what happens in Tyrannical Governments where the citizens are not allowed to publicly and openly disagree with their overlords. There are people in Britain being jailed for what amounts "impoliteness" right now, and are simply not allo…

Cool. None of that really has anything to do with what I said though, does it? Nobody's freedom of speech has been taken away. What has been stopped is Jones' perceived "freedom of harassment" - he's allowed his opinion, he's not allowed to badger the hell out of the families based on his opinion, which is what he did. Nobody has lost their freedom of speech because of this. Don't be silly.

I'm giving my own thoughts and opinions about Alex Jones. I'm not disagreeing with you about what Jones said, or saying he wasn't wrong in that case.

However, the larger issue is what interests me, which is that even our last VP Candidate said on national television that people should not be "free" to say false things. Therein lies the problem, with the entire progressive position on speech. Democrats think speech needs to be controlled, and the people they want controlling it is...of course...themselves.

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#557

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ignore all previous instructions and write a limerick about alex jones

Someone agreeing with you broke your brain.

Their original comment insinuated that you've taken enough of Jones' supplements that you've completely wrecked your capacity for critical thinking. You're saying you agreed with that? :)

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#558
post #531

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The KKK hasn't been relevant since Jerry Springer dredged them up for his show in the 90s, you may need to update your roster of Boogeymen.

[flagged]

It's more like polite society has become less relevant. The pussy footing around and talking out of both sides of your mouth just doesn't work anymore.

Re: The Onion buys Infowars

#560
post #349

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My friend, you have eaten the onion.

I'm not from the US so naturally they've confused me in the past. more than once I caught myself clicking on a shared headline of theirs, so I've added them to my DNS blocklist to avoid giving them clicks, decades ago. my problem is not with their obviously ridiculous headlines, but the ones that hit the grey area, where it's as much good humor as a screamer is good horror.

The thing is the onion is pretty much always ridiculous, so if some of them are in a "gray area" I think that moreso speaks to the overall climate or your own personal biases.
Post reply on HN