Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
The KKK hasn't been relevant since Jerry Springer dredged them up for his show in the 90s, you may need to update your roster of Boogeymen.
The Onion buys Infowars
531–540 of 1001 posts
Re: The Onion buys Infowars
#532The announcement by America's Finest News Source: https://theonion.com/heres-why-i-decided-to-buy-infowars/ Alex Jones response: https://x.com/RealAlexJones/status/1857058831135645739
Re: The Onion buys Infowars
#533Earlier quoted context omitted.
Since Musk's acquisition of Twitter, it has increasingly become a right wing echo chamber and place to promote conspiracy theories. And Alex Jones' InfoWars and Elon Musk's Twitter are both likely to show you advertisements for supplements of dubious effectiveness and other generally scammy products. So yeah, Jones fits right in there.
It really hasn’t.
there are both in-depth studies and anecdotal evidence that suggest hate speech has been growing under Mr Musk's tenure.
https://www.socialmediatoday.com/news/data-shows-x-suspendin... Data Shows X Is Suspending Far Fewer Users for Hate Speech
And, finally: Alex Jones was unbanned. That alone is proof of rising support for hate speech. He's literally been proven to be a lying provocateur in court, it doesn't get much clearer than thatRe: The Onion buys Infowars
#534Earlier quoted context omitted.
Lawfare? This is literally how defamation works. If someone said on the Internet said that rs999gti was a "tax-evading, pyramid-scheming, mullet-wearing, karaoke-ruining, ferret-hoarding, snake-oil-selling, cereal-with-water-eating, grammar-mangling, table-manner-less, engagement-ring-pawning, salad-dodging, traffic-cone-stealing, apology-dodger," and it wasn’t true, I think you’d probably like to sue them and take t…
> Lawfare? Yes the court's judgment is so high, 1B USD, that he cannot make money without it being garnished. How does he get back to work? I personally do not think anyone should lose their livelihood over speech, NOTE: I did not say free speech. What he did is reprehensible but not enough that he is basically black balled from making a living. Penalties yes, loss of livelihood no.
"The garnishment amount is limited to 25% of your disposable earnings for that week (what's left after mandatory deductions) or the amount by which your disposable earnings for that week exceed 30 times the federal minimum hourly wage, whichever is less."
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/if-wages-are-garnish...
Re: The Onion buys Infowars
#535Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I don’t know exactly what compensation they should get, but this does not seem like a healthy or sustainable way for our society to deal with tragedy. I don't know if it's healthy or sustainable, but it definitely sounds healthier than ignoring the tragedy altogether.
No. I actually don’t think lashing out at any wallet that happens to be in the area will make anyone happy. The people who are responsible are dead.
Re: The Onion buys Infowars
#536Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sounds like someone has been taking their alpha brain supplements.
I'm with you on the supplement nonsense. I think a recent study showed most so-called supplements contain precisely zero of the active ingredient they claim to have, and do absolutely nothing. I'm a small-gov't guy, but except when it comes to food and drug inspections. I think we do need to regulate the supplement industry.
Re: The Onion buys Infowars
#537Earlier quoted context omitted.
I really hate this lazy argument, that what happened to Alex Jones is another step on the slippery slope to fascism or something. He was sued for defamation and lost. Defamation has been a tort in the US this entire time. Defamation as a concept goes back centuries before the US was even founded. There wasn’t some change to defamation laws that brought down Alex Jones, there wasn’t some novel interpretation of the st…
Jones has been wrong about multiple things. So has every media outlet especially since someone came down some escalators. I don't personally think someone should lose their entire business for being wrong. CNN has called all conservatives Nazis for years, and they are liars. Do you think CNN should be sued out of existence? Personally I think CNN has every right to lie. They've now done it so much that they self-dest…
This is a very disingenuous take. There's a litany of footage of Alex Jones saying everything he said about Sandy Hook being fake and speaking ill of those impacted family members - do you have a litany of footage of CNN anchors/staff calling all conservatives Nazis?
Re: The Onion buys Infowars
#538Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not even your average Elon hater, and I still think X is a stupid name. Dude should've just kept the name and brand that everyone knows already.
Elon just likes X. I feel he bought the entire site in part due to ego. And it was part of the "everything app" branding too IIRC.
Re: The Onion buys Infowars
#539Earlier quoted context omitted.
they are fueled by clickbait, and they've promoted the practice. it's probably the first site I've manually added to my dns blacklist.
My friend, you have eaten the onion.
more than once I caught myself clicking on a shared headline of theirs, so I've added them to my DNS blocklist to avoid giving them clicks, decades ago.
my problem is not with their obviously ridiculous headlines, but the ones that hit the grey area, where it's as much good humor as a screamer is good horror.
Re: The Onion buys Infowars
#540I'm watching his stream just to see how the drama goes down and a silly tech-adjacent bit popped up when he started ranting about Linux and how if "they" were trying to take Linus Torvalds down, they still couldn't ever own Linux!