Live data from Hacker News

Rider is now free for non-commercial use

jetbrains.com

351–360 of 435 posts

Re: Rider is now free for non-commercial use

#351

Earlier quoted context omitted.

GDScript is not good and never will be.

If it wasn't good then first, it wouldn't be shipped with the engine, second, people wouldn't use it to make games.

The same reasoning can be applied to JavaScript and everything else where the platform offers one main language in detriment of others.

Re: Rider is now free for non-commercial use

#352
post #167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But it was already free for students, and they have a partnership program with OSS which allows you to use it for free as well.

You need to apply once a year and you need to be a maintainer of an active oss project for the oss license. From my experience they're very lenient in regards to what they consider active, but I don't think I'd jump trough the hoops if I didn't start using Rider with the student license. Free for non-commercial offers a easy way to get people to use it and hopefully advocate for it at their jobs.

I did jump through the hoops every year and it's mostly fine, a 20m form filling exercise. I only had to explain one time that my project was still ongoing despite having a lot of seemingly automated commits.

Re: Rider is now free for non-commercial use

#353
I like Rider very much, but personally moved to VSCode because of many little annoying bugs that aren't being fixed. E.g. typescript refactoring problems, .NET native code debugging from C#, TFS support etc. And maybe it's changing but I felt that the progress for new features and IDE maintenance stalled (for obvious reasons).

Re: Rider is now free for non-commercial use

#354

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you mean for .NET development, there’s still light years between vscode and this. Whereas .NET extensions for vscode are still in their infancy, Rider has been creating a comprehensive IDE for .NET to rival the full edition of Visual Stdio for years. We are talking full Solution file support, Nuget, majorly advanced refactoring via Resharper, pretty much everything you could wish for. And it runs on a Mac!

It sounds like you haven't used the C# extensions in a while. VSCode has Solution File and Nuget support with the C# Dev Kit. Refactoring isn't bad either though not as featureful as I remember from Resharper.

Cool - vscode is nice and I use it all the time for other stacks, but - for .NET - relying on an ecosystem of third party extensions is never going to provide that unified experience that you get from a purpose-built IDE. Try both and you’ll see what I mean. The love poured into Rider is obvious.

Re: Rider is now free for non-commercial use

#355

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Actually you should take a look at Rider in that case. It’s about 120% of what VS on Windows is! I use it as my daily IDE for a production .NET back end. You won’t look back I promise.

Can it open VS solution and project files?

Yes, it can pretty much do everything you’d get in Visual Studio.

Re: Rider is now free for non-commercial use

#356

As a paying subscriber I love this move for the .NET community. As a .NET dev for many years, I've noticed there have been periods of time where either Visual Studio or Rider was far better than the other. Currently, Rider is much better. Hopefully this encourages more people to try out C# & F#. Both fantastic languages. - Edit - Looks like Webstorm (JS/TS editor) is also free now.

> - Edit - Looks like Webstorm (JS/TS editor) is also free now. Wow. VSCode finally got them, it seems.

Almost (or maybe even all) of what WebStorm does, you can do it in Rider or RustRover (which is also free). So it make no sense to not also make WebStorm free.

Re: Rider is now free for non-commercial use

#357

Limited commercial use 1 to 3 devs should also be freek as projects this small usually are just starting and aren't profitable yet. Beyond that, yes , it should be sustainable for the team to pay for commercial license.

This is like hiring construction workers, but not having money to buy them a hammer and nails. This ridiculous notion that software developers need to use free tools and neither they or their employer can't pay for any is very odd to me.

Re: Rider is now free for non-commercial use

#358
post #78

For someone who just got into game development on Mac, this is very interesting. I'd never heard of this IDE before. Will give it a try.

good luck, they will expect you to pay $149 / yr even if you don't make a penny off your game all the while you coulda probably just made it in VS code for free...

I wonder if construction workers also expect someone to give them free hammers and nails if they want to work on hobby projects. I doubt that. So maybe then software engineers shouldn't be so stuck up about not paying for their tools either?

Re: Rider is now free for non-commercial use

#359

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No. If you have money to pay for developers, you also have money to pay for tools. Especially since software licenses are going to be a tiny fraction of what the developers cost.

What about 1 developer developing something for commercial use ?

They also offer a personal license, which I would say should be affordable to any devs if they were getting money. Rider is $149/year for the first year, $119 for second, and $89/year for the third year onward.

Re: Rider is now free for non-commercial use

#360

Earlier quoted context omitted.

good luck, they will expect you to pay $149 / yr even if you don't make a penny off your game all the while you coulda probably just made it in VS code for free...

I wonder if construction workers also expect someone to give them free hammers and nails if they want to work on hobby projects. I doubt that. So maybe then software engineers shouldn't be so stuck up about not paying for their tools either?

unless there are competitors who do offer free hammers and nails (the VS Code of construction), I think your analogy fails
Post reply on HN