Earlier quoted context omitted.
During sentencing, SBF attempted to argue that creditors had experienced "zero harm" as even then it was apparent FTX would be able to pay them back. John Ray himself rebutted that argument: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66631292/415/united-sta... . > And even taking into account the potential for achieving anticipated recovery levels, which is by no means assured, customers still will never be in the same pos…
I'm not arguing that, it doesn't change the fact that a crime occured. I'm just saying the title is not misleading. They mentioned it is bankrupt and by definition creditor rights are curtailed.
FTX creditors will make money on bankruptcy
121–130 of 155 posts
Re: FTX creditors will make money on bankruptcy
#122Earlier quoted context omitted.
They don't have to be overpaying. It was a win win. The way I read it the county got more money this way than if they held it. They they sold the stake ultimately worth 17 million, but they got their rights back, which they resold for 16 million. As long as they sold their stake for 1 million or more, they are in the green.
The rights were back to them at the time of default. It was independent of the claim sale. (They won on the reselling of the naming rights too by leasing them out for more per year than ftx)
Re: FTX creditors will make money on bankruptcy
#123Imagine spending 25 years in federal prison knowing you might have avoided it if only you had not filed for bankruptcy.
No, it only works because of magic of bankruptcy law converting liabilities to dollar value at the time of filling.
Re: FTX creditors will make money on bankruptcy
#124Re: FTX creditors will make money on bankruptcy
#125Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's definitely a pattern, but I don't want to assume motive. I doubt SBF will get his retrial, but still, it's good PR for a lot of people -- for Effective Altruism, for Stanford, for Sequoia -- whose reputations took a hit here. It's even good PR for the bankruptcy team to say that they got full restitution. And for the journalists, of course, it's a headline that really pops. But sitting here, we can't really k…
Or, it's just kinda and interesting story on it's own, no crazy conspiracy theories needed? When Bernie Madoff or Enron or any of the other major headline-grabbing frauds fell apart, the victims generally got back almost nothing. The fact that FTX is returning all of the user's money, plus interest, is quite unique and newsworthy.
"That said, the repayments do exceed expectations. That is newsworthy. I just wish they could report that news factually."
So to flip it back on you: repaying the lowball marks, but not the actual full stolen value, is an interesting story on its own. No lies and exaggerations from the media are needed.
Also, where you write:
> "The fact that FTX is returning all of the user's money..."
No. This is not a "fact". This is a lie. You have been misinformed. That's my whole point. Do not call it a fact.
Re: FTX creditors will make money on bankruptcy
#126The statement is misleading. People are making 18% interest on the value of Bitcoin et al. at the value of 2022, which is less than $20k. Now that is $60k, back to the value levels of 2021. Thus, the only reason there is interest is that the cryptocurrencies found gained back their value, and the bankruptcy court gets to consider the values when the bankruptcy started in 2022, not current/before 2022 values.
I'm seeing a pattern of misleading headlines wrt this. My guess is that it is PR at work to convince public that FTX was a victimless crime - this is to help SBF avoid his full sentence.
Re: FTX creditors will make money on bankruptcy
#127Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not arguing that, it doesn't change the fact that a crime occured. I'm just saying the title is not misleading. They mentioned it is bankrupt and by definition creditor rights are curtailed.
To the common man, "made money" and "experienced economic harm" would contradict each other. In that way the title misleads.
Re: FTX creditors will make money on bankruptcy
#128Earlier quoted context omitted.
there are hundreds of exchanges. how many of them are fully collateralized? doubt all of them are.
Those that aren't fully collateralized are committing fraud.
Fun fact: I got a permanent ban from the r/cryptocurrency discord for saying exactly this.
Re: FTX creditors will make money on bankruptcy
#129The statement is misleading. People are making 18% interest on the value of Bitcoin et al. at the value of 2022, which is less than $20k. Now that is $60k, back to the value levels of 2021. Thus, the only reason there is interest is that the cryptocurrencies found gained back their value, and the bankruptcy court gets to consider the values when the bankruptcy started in 2022, not current/before 2022 values.
In yet another “crypto is just speed-running regular finance” moment, they ran the same crock about _Nick Leeson_. And that was a far from victimless crime as well.
its just a bankruptcy case being handled well, and far faster because of the blockchain records showing where things went.
Re: FTX creditors will make money on bankruptcy
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
blame CZ. had he not triggered the run on FTX assets by making those tweets, likely FTX had enough assets to survive until Bitcoin began its rebound.
I see a disturbing trend in your posts: you seem to want to place the blame anywhere but on SBF's shoulders, where it rightfully belongs. Exchanges shouldn't be like banks. FTX should have had customer assets on hand to return, no matter what. That's how regulated exchanges are supposed to work. But this is crypto-land, where nobody does the right thing.
the truth is that in the US none of this gets prosecuted while people are making money, or being reimbursed as a remedy at the company's own volition.
very few exceptions, you basically have to piss off a completely different industry, like bragging about raising drug prices instead of silently like everyone else, for prosecutors to search for improper accounting to nail you with.