Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Just a glimpse of the article shows there's some research behind making the point of the headline, still people feel the need to comment on their feelings to deny it possibly could be due to climate change. because "due to" is simplistic when we are dealing with multiple factors. heavier rain might be more common due to climate change, but it causes a lot more flooding than it otherwise would because of the blockin…
I guess retreating from denial to nit-picking is at least some progress.
The "deniers" are clearly right about one thing - rational argument is not welcome.