191–200 of 644 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Greg Brockman, OpenAI President and co-founder is also on extended leave of absence. And John Schulman, and Peter Deng are out already. Yet the company is still shipping, like no other. Recent multimodal integrations and benchmarks of o1 are outstanding.
[flagged]
It is hard for me to square "This company is a few short years away from building world-changing AGI" and "I'm stepping away to do my own thing". Maybe I'm just bad at putting myself in someone else's shoes, but I feel like if I had spent years working towards a vision of AGI, and thought that success was finally just around the corner, it'd be very difficult to walk away.
This is a very strange company to say the least.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t think we’re gonna see a winter. LLMs are here to stay. Natural language interfaces are great. Embeddings are incredibly useful. They just won’t be the hottest thing since smartphones.
I just made a (IMHO) cool test with OpenAI/Linux/TCL-TK: "write a TCL/tk script file that is a "frontend" to the ls command: It should provide checkboxes and dropdowns for the different options available in bash ls and a button "RUN" to run the configured ls command. The output of the ls command should be displayed in a Text box inside the interface. The script must be runnable using tclsh" It didn't get it right the…
Current LLMs being 80% to being 100% useful doesn't mean there's only 20% effort left.
It means we got the lowest-hanging 80% of utility.
Bridging that last 20% is going to take a ton of work. Indeed, maybe 4x the effort that getting this far required.
And people also overestimate the utility of a solution that's randomly wrong. It's exceedingly difficult to build reliable systems when you're stacking a 5% wrong solution on another 5% wrong solution on another 5% wrong solution...
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Greg Brockman, OpenAI President and co-founder is also on extended leave of absence. And John Schulman, and Peter Deng are out already. Yet the company is still shipping, like no other. Recent multimodal integrations and benchmarks of o1 are outstanding.
Quite interesting that this comment is downvoted when the content is factually correct and pertinent. It's a very relevant fact that Greg Brockman recently left on his own volition. Greg was aligned with Sam during the coup. So, the fact that Greg left lends more credence to the idea that Murati is leaving on her own volition.
Except that isn’t true. He has not resigned from OpenAI. He’s on extended leave until the end of the year.
That could become an official resignation later, and I agree that that seems more likely than not. But stating that he’s left for good as of right now is misleading.
Related (possibly): OpenAI to remove non-profit control and give Sam Altman equity https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41651548
Interesting that gwern predicted this as well yesterday > Translation for the rest of us: "we need to fully privatize the OA subsidiary and turn it into a B-corp which can raise a lot more capital over the next decade, in order to achieve the goals of the nonprofit, because the chief threat is not anything like existential risk from autonomous agents in the next few years or arms races, but inadequate commercializati…
Probably not.
It is hard for me to square "This company is a few short years away from building world-changing AGI" and "I'm stepping away to do my own thing". Maybe I'm just bad at putting myself in someone else's shoes, but I feel like if I had spent years working towards a vision of AGI, and thought that success was finally just around the corner, it'd be very difficult to walk away.
most of the people seem to be leaving due to the direction where Altman is taking OpenAI. It went from a charity to him seemingly doing everything possible to monetize it for himself both directly and indirectly by him trying to raise funds for AI adjacent traditionally structured companies he controlled probably not coincidence that she resigned at almost the same time the rumors about OpenAI completely removing the…
It is hard for me to square "This company is a few short years away from building world-changing AGI" and "I'm stepping away to do my own thing". Maybe I'm just bad at putting myself in someone else's shoes, but I feel like if I had spent years working towards a vision of AGI, and thought that success was finally just around the corner, it'd be very difficult to walk away.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This feels naive, especially given what we now know about Open AI.
If you care to detail supporting evidence, I'd be keen to see. Please no speculative pieces, rumor nor hearsay.
CEOs get fired all the time and company puts out a statement.
I've never seen "we won't tell you why we fired our CEO" anywhere.
now he is back making totally ridiculous statments like 'AI is going to solve all of physics' or that 'AI is going to clone my brain by 2027'
This is a strange company.