People falling in the ages old trap of antropormophizing Oracle executives.
For those unfamiliar. Worth a watch.
91–100 of 135 posts
People falling in the ages old trap of antropormophizing Oracle executives.
For those unfamiliar. Worth a watch.
i don't think oracle does anything in order to earn goodwill or because it's the right thing. they're structurally immune to moral suasion. don't forget that oracle was the company that sued google for the independent reimplementation of java they used in android. if you want oracle to do something, you either need to offer them a lot of money or level an extremely credible, well-financed legal threat at them as agum…
i don't think oracle does anything in order to earn goodwill or because it's the right thing. they're structurally immune to moral suasion. don't forget that oracle was the company that sued google for the independent reimplementation of java they used in android. if you want oracle to do something, you either need to offer them a lot of money or level an extremely credible, well-financed legal threat at them as agum…
— Brian Cantrill on Larry Ellison, USENIX 2011
[0] https://youtu.be/-zRN7XLCRhc?feature=shared&t=2115Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is nothing better about "JS" over "JavaScript".
"JavaSciript" implies it's some scripting language related to Java, which was originally an idea, where it was meant to control Java Applets. But that is not a thing anymore. Thus the name makes no sense. "JS" is just a name only conflicting with my initials.
i don't think oracle does anything in order to earn goodwill or because it's the right thing. they're structurally immune to moral suasion. don't forget that oracle was the company that sued google for the independent reimplementation of java they used in android. if you want oracle to do something, you either need to offer them a lot of money or level an extremely credible, well-financed legal threat at them as agum…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Is this really so? […] I have the feeling this is 'popular' because there are no alternatives I think it's pretty clear that JavaScript is the most popular one. And yes, it's popular because in it's space it's without alternatives. But so was C for many environments. We can judge if that's fair or unfair, but it does not change the situation we have.
Well, there are alternatives. Many people user TypeScript (which then is compiled to JavaScript) or some other alternative. JavaScript is just a compiler artifact format.
i don't think oracle does anything in order to earn goodwill or because it's the right thing. they're structurally immune to moral suasion. don't forget that oracle was the company that sued google for the independent reimplementation of java they used in android. if you want oracle to do something, you either need to offer them a lot of money or level an extremely credible, well-financed legal threat at them as agum…
"Don't anthropomorphise the lawnmower[0]" — Brian Cantrill on Larry Ellison, USENIX 2011 [0] https://youtu.be/-zRN7XLCRhc?feature=shared&t=2115
All jokes aside though, they don’t care, and frankly speaking, despite how much sense it makes for them to release the trademark, they have no reason to care.
To seriously move the needle on this issue, you need deep pockets and lawyers.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Makes me wonder if there are rules to use area names for your brands. Can I start Tennesseescript ?
this is an interesting angle. maybe the js luminaries signing this open letter can get support from the government in jakarta. i didn't realize this, but a hundred and fifty-six million people live in literal java