Live data from Hacker News

Anandtech: Macbook Pro with Retina Display Review

anandtech.com

91–100 of 121 posts

Re: Anandtech: Macbook Pro with Retina Display Review

#91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The ethernet port, much like the optical disk/Firewire is gone forever from Apple laptops. I use an ethernet cable at home/work with a permanently connected dongle, and carry one in my bag while travelling. It's never been a problem, and, as soon as they start rolling out 802.11ac, I expect you'll have even less need for one at home/work (though may still be useful in hotels/remote offices without wireless)

You can buy an Ethernet adapter to use with Airs or this new MBP.

So, if not an adapter, what exactly do you think he meant by "dongle"?

Re: Anandtech: Macbook Pro with Retina Display Review

#92
post #76

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes however retina games don't require 4x AA to look great. So you're trading one performance hit for another.

4x AA is only a 15-20% hit when you're talking about MSAA: http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/535?i=455.488.456.492

Not all games support MSAA, however yes it's much more GPU friendly.

Re: Anandtech: Macbook Pro with Retina Display Review

#93
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The key word here is "judged" - whether the boxster/cayman is a better car than the 911 is exactly that, a matter of judgement. An early 70's 911, all that weight hanging over/behind the skinny (by modern standards) rear wheels, no traction control - a joy to drive. That's just a judgement too!

No... read the quote again. "The ONLY reason you would buy one of these is because you can't afford a 911..." He has it backwards. The only reason why the Boxster/Cayman is crippled as compared to the 911 is because the Porsche 911 "fans" are keeping it from becoming the best. If you go back far enough when they had the whole air-cooled vs water-cooled engine nonsense, it's the exact same thing. You don't have to tak…

He's a troll. In a very rare, good sense of the word :-)

Re: Anandtech: Macbook Pro with Retina Display Review

#94
post #23

The "glare handling" pictures makes me wonder why anybody would buy a portable device (=to sometimes be used outdoors) and be happy with those outrageous reflections. I mean, you can barely see the content! http://www.anandtech.com/show/6023/the-nextgen-macbook-pro-w... With the new decice, Aplle again tries to makes those unusable mirrors the only display you can order. I'll pass.

I can't understand why Apple offers a glossy display, the screen has to be angled slightly and that's the perfect setup for glare from ambient light.

It's like trying to read a glossy magazine and you keep having to shift around to see it avoiding the glare off the page.

Whether it makes blacks blacker or colours sharper the end result is it's annoying.

Re: Anandtech: Macbook Pro with Retina Display Review

#95
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Note: the ethernet chip _is_ present. In this article (anandtech) they look at Gigabit Ethernet performance and benchmark it at 925-928 Mbps - using the _Thunderbolt_ adapter. Over at the iFixit teardown (step #13), you can see that the ethernet chip is present on the I/O board: "Broadcom BCM57100 series Gigabit Ethernet + Memory Card reader controller" http://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/MacBook-Pro-with-Retina-Displ...

I'd like to see a teardown of the adapter. My understanding of thunderbolt is it's not going to carry ethernet signals. There's another ethernet chip in the adapter (I think). The one on the motherboard is there primarily for the smart card reader and because it allows Apple to use the same chip on the laptops that do have ethernet jacks.

Correct. Tunderbolt is PCI-Express + Displayport. PCIEx part is what makes all these dongles possible at great speeds.

Re: Anandtech: Macbook Pro with Retina Display Review

#96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you've rather missed his point - it has nothing to do with how good the car is to drive or not, it's a judgment on what buying the car would say about your aspirations. As usual from Clarkson, it's extremely opinionated and nobody sensible would take it as the final arbiter on anything, although it is a unique and fairly perceptive take on the car.

In which case the poseurs driving 911s should go out and shoot themselves in the head since they can't afford a Carrera GT... which is also mid-engine.

They made 1,200 of the things. Failing to be wealthy enough to own such a limited-production car is only called "failure" by a very few.

Re: Anandtech: Macbook Pro with Retina Display Review

#97
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The key word here is "judged" - whether the boxster/cayman is a better car than the 911 is exactly that, a matter of judgement. An early 70's 911, all that weight hanging over/behind the skinny (by modern standards) rear wheels, no traction control - a joy to drive. That's just a judgement too!

No... read the quote again. "The ONLY reason you would buy one of these is because you can't afford a 911..." He has it backwards. The only reason why the Boxster/Cayman is crippled as compared to the 911 is because the Porsche 911 "fans" are keeping it from becoming the best. If you go back far enough when they had the whole air-cooled vs water-cooled engine nonsense, it's the exact same thing. You don't have to tak…

It isn't about 911 fans doing anything. Porsche has done this before, with the 914 vs. the 911. The 911 is an icon, and Porsche is a company that leans on history/lineage to help sell their cars, much like Triumph Motorcycles. They believe that keeping the idea of the 911 alive is better for the company in the long run.

Re: Anandtech: Macbook Pro with Retina Display Review

#98
post #13
post #4

He's unsatisfied with his 'old' MBP 15" (previous gen) because "it always made me feel like the old fogey at tradeshows where everyone else had something 13-inches or smaller". Stuff like that defies parody.

>Stuff like that defies parody. You mean the mentioning-his-actual-feelings part? Should he have lied to seem more "deep" and "above all that"? Or is mere fashion and consumerism absent from the general public at large, so that a journalist admitting to it would be hilarious? Not to mention that that is just a tongue-in-cheek single phrase from a multi-thousand words review.

Or is mere fashion and consumerism absent from the general public at large

I admit, I cracked a grin. Of all subjects to be devoid of fashion and consumerism, Apple?

Re: Anandtech: Macbook Pro with Retina Display Review

#99
post #94
post #23

The "glare handling" pictures makes me wonder why anybody would buy a portable device (=to sometimes be used outdoors) and be happy with those outrageous reflections. I mean, you can barely see the content! http://www.anandtech.com/show/6023/the-nextgen-macbook-pro-w... With the new decice, Aplle again tries to makes those unusable mirrors the only display you can order. I'll pass.

I can't understand why Apple offers a glossy display, the screen has to be angled slightly and that's the perfect setup for glare from ambient light. It's like trying to read a glossy magazine and you keep having to shift around to see it avoiding the glare off the page. Whether it makes blacks blacker or colours sharper the end result is it's annoying.

It makes the display 'pop' indoors, some people like shiny things, and it is a popular platform for art-stuff.

Re: Anandtech: Macbook Pro with Retina Display Review

#100
post #8

I'm hoping that we see a 13" Air edition with the Retina Display sometime soon. That I will pull the trigger on.

Considering the 13" Pro doesn't have room for a discrete GPU, I doubt we're going to see a retina Air until a few more revs of Intel's integrated GPUs.

If they had stuck an APU in the Air, we might not have had to wait

[1] http://lenzfire.com/2011/11/reason-for-apple-to-reject-amd-l...

Post reply on HN